48 Hours a Day

Q: How exactly does the book's power system rank?

A: Khan, if you look at the questions you have about the power system, you can understand that the book was set up with reference to Neil Geiman's "The Gods of America," as you can see from the message that some of the children's boots were already there.

The most central part of Neil Geiman's setup is that man created God, not the other way around.

Specific power system construction I will write later, you can also find the "American Gods" to take a look at, but the "American Gods" own power setting is confusing, and according to modern web text, the opening is very poisonous. I also thank you for your reminders. I will further refine the content in the follow-up.

Q: Shouldn't the strongest three be the well-known ones?

A: Yes, unlike the Greek vote in Rome, the real world has more than 100 million righteous followers, but unfortunately I can't write for some well-known reason.

Self-castration is one of the necessary skills for a creator's life.

I needed to make some compromises in exchange for the book's safety, so I didn't write any of the other two except for the Jewish god who often appeared in film and television works (some were mentioned earlier, and I said he didn't end up in the previous chapter).

You can say it's an elephant in the room, but I pretend not to see it. The friends of the Great Squid God have been shielded. I am even more timid. Thanks for your patience. I also understand your doubts.

Q: Why is there no local god?

A: One reason is that the cultural differences between East and West are quite large, and the difficulty of mixing them is too high. I haven't seen a book that reconciles the two without creating a sense of discord, so I personally don't like to put them together. Another reason, for security reasons, is to write Buddha, you can write ghosts, and the ban on the film and television circle is known, so the starting point scare channel was cut off before, so you know, especially when you don't know where the line is, it's always right to cut more points. Actually, there are some things that I can understand, and if you look at the South Korean problem next door, of course, I still hope that there will be a better solution in the future.

Perhaps decades from now, our materialistic education will be popular, and when you can look at this piece of work from a more open perspective, the people who left it will come back to reclaim the land, and I always thought it would be a shame to disappear as a type of creation.

Q: Irrespective of the previous chapter, I saw some readers suggesting to me, "Why didn't you take a penny for something you don't understand?"

A: I've always believed that authenticity is created by details, so even where I don't understand it, I'm willing to look at the information and write it in more detail, not in a single piece. (Also, I'm afraid this book will have to be handed over) But there will definitely be problems in it, such as outdated data, or disagreements in itself, and the big aspects are actually very good to investigate, but instead, some details are quite troublesome. For example, when I wrote about the war in Sufin, the soldiers on both sides had a few meals a day, and every meal was hard to find, but if I didn't look for it, I also lacked bricks to build the world, and I wrote about Tokyo drift. I searched for a study abroad video of some great god on station B, and I looked at other accommodation, admission procedures. I would look into all of these, including what kind of bank cards international students typically run. I also bought a lot of references to Apollo after that. (The process of flipping is painful, but also interesting)

There's nothing to be proud of. It's part of my job.

After all, this is just this web text, I need to maintain a certain amount of updates in order to make money, and my state will also have certain ups and downs, there will always be places I didn't expect, I can only do what I can, but inevitably there will be negligence in some details, but by now I have found that the readers' professions and hobbies are also strange, there are people working in space, there are swordplay enthusiasts, diving coaches... everyone is great and always picking my fault. (• ̥ू)

In addition, I have always faced the problem of striking a balance between the truth of writing and the beauty of reading.

For example, the black sail copy, the voting system on the boat is not cool enough, because even if Zhang Heng mixes up with the captain, he may be overthrown by his men, and there is no gambling on the boat, but that's what the real situation was, the captain is kind of on thin ice, you need to coordinate the relationship between your men, which is your top priority, probably more important than you rob.

That's why Pirates of the Caribbean is so much hotter than the drama Black Sail. Pirates of the Caribbean is sensually exciting and beautiful, and everyone likes to see something cool, and I'm no exception.

So sometimes I make tradeoffs, like the one about swordplay, the real swordplay and the movie and television works are different, like the reader who likes swordplay told me that no one in the real swordwalk triumphs face-to-face with a razor, but I think it's quite heroic, but it still leaves the razor blade part.

I have also been adjusting and testing the rhythm.

Q: One last question, here you are, Rory.

A: No. I don't think it's going to work. You're going to have to press me to the hammer. I know I owe you a lot of chapters, and I owe you both the original and the original. It's going to make up for it. Shame. (ಥ_ಥ)

ps: This chapter is long but not expensive.