Almighty Game Designer

The screens in the live broadcast room have been brushed by the 666, and the audience on the scene are all bluffing.

It can be said that the vast majority of people present did not expect Chen stranger to come up with this kind of statement.

Professor Xu's expression was very exciting. Obviously, he wanted to shoot the table and say it was “a bunch of nonsense”, but his hands were lifted and he couldn't take it.

The other two guests were also face-to-face, and it was clear that their brains were spinning at a rapid pace in an attempt to refute the rhetoric, but for a while they were poor.

What's wrong with Chan?

Something's wrong!

At least the first reaction the other guest is hearing is, isn't that bullshit?

But from beginning to end, the logic seems to be quite complete...

Examples such as Mike's sarcastic capitalism, words on police cars, FIB-related drama, etc. are all in the GTA, and it is impossible for Chen to blatantly fabricate rumors in public. With these elements, Chan says that the GTA is exposing the ugliness of capitalism, as if it were logically very smooth.

Besides, simply grasping the violent elements of GTA is not really enough.

Too much beautification of a scene can discount criticism when a carrier presents a scenario with the main goal of "revealing” and "criticizing”. Simply put, like some magazines writing old society beheaded, ignorant and ignorant people with the blood of revolutionaries trying to cure disease, the plot is actually quite bloody, even more bloody than most movies and TV shows shoot people to death.

But if the effects of this bloody violence are to be eliminated and the plot overbeautified, the “critical” effect it is going to achieve will not exist.

If all similar subjects are forced to do as if they were fairy tales, they can only be perceived as utter falsehood and eventually become complete cultural trash.

These people's questioning of the GTA mainly focused on its “violent” appearance, while Chen Jiao raised the subject to a higher “spiritual content”, so he raised the subject directly, forming a “downbeat".

And the key to this is that the GTA must be sufficiently rich.

GTA really does.

Is it a game that encourages crime? Not really.

Most people just touch a little fur and think that GTA encourages crime, which is not true.

GTA does not encourage crime, nor does it induce indiscriminate killings and massacres by players. It is not what most people think of as a bloodthirsty river and lake, let alone an unbridled and happy benevolence that teenagers aspire to, but rather an increasingly tight shackle. It talks about the sadness of being manipulated by an invisible enemy after a victory over an invisible enemy.

In the GTA world, there has never been a false bridge between crime and prosperity, but a constant betrayal of one's own friends, or betrayal of one's own friends, who had to temporarily bow to the more powerful forces of evil to serve as biting dogs for FIB's crowned beasts.

The stories that seem to stimulate player hormones, in fact, are just constantly wiping people's asses, completing tasks one after another, but never redeeming their freedom from FIB.

The protagonist of the exhortation for rain in the previous work may die like a wild dog in his next work, and no one cares about him.

When they first entered the GTA world, perhaps many people would indulge in the pleasure of killing and looting, but as the plot progressed, players would feel the sadness of the protagonists, and they would find that everyone in the story, even the little protagonists, had their own sadness. And the deeper exposition of the status quo of society as a whole that emerges from this is the key to making GTA different from a swimming, distracted work.

……

The debate over Today's Current Affairs Debate is still under way, but the wind direction on the Internet has completely reversed to Chen Yu's side.

Of course, it is impossible for Professor Xu and Baiyu Chen to conquer everyone with this statement. For people like him, this position that “violent games necessarily trigger crime” has been premised in their brains, and no more explanation can convince them.

But, of course, Chen Jiao's words were not addressed to the three opponents, but to the audience in front of the TV and the computer who were watching this hot spot.

What Chen wants is public opinion's support for GTA, or at least no objection, and tolerance and understanding of game development, especially virtual games, across the social environment.

In the second half of the show, several opposition guests and live viewers were still trying to refute Chen Jiao's claims, but Chen Jiaoyi responded, taking full ownership of the scene.

At the end of the show, Hu Yue asked Chen Yu: “Thank you very much for coming to today's current affairs debate to give an official explanation of the GTA game and to give us a better understanding of what it really means. Finally, I have another question that was raised by a live audience earlier. Traditional violent games may not have much impact, but will the matrix game compartment, as the next generation VR, have much more immersion and authenticity than traditional PC and mobile games? ”

Instead of answering directly, Chen Qiao asked: "What do you think the future of virtual reality technology will be? ”

Hu Yue stunned: “The future? I think the future should be closer and closer to the real world. ”

Chen Jiao nodded: “Yes, the so-called virtual reality focuses on ‘reality’. Whether or not some are willing to admit it, the ultimate form of virtual reality will be a perfect reproduction of reality, even beyond reality. What kind of virtual reality will we create in the future? Is it a ‘paradise' where one lives in peace, where no crime takes place? ”

“I'm sorry, although this is a good wish, it may only exist in a few unrealistic thoughts. Similar false images, whether novels, movies, television dramas, comics or games, are virtually non-existent from current works of art. If you don't believe me, think about whether there are any popular movies or bestselling books that all live happily ever after. I think a similar scenario can only be found in heaven. ”

“Why? Because the vast majority of people don't like this falsehood. ”

“The development of virtual reality into the future must also be pluralistic, with true beauty and false ugliness. Positive, negative, these are the two sides of the coin, remove all the negative things, the positive things will look false, the whole world will become pale and powerless. Negative things are meant to inspire people's aspirations to good things so that they can better understand what is good. ”

“So will the violent elements of next generation VR performance have a more severe impact? My answer is, no. Not only will it not, but it is also a necessary path to virtual reality, the virtual world of the future is an all-encompassing world, and the widest spectrum of players have the right to judge what is good and what is bad. ”