Dungeons for the Devil, Dungeons for the Core (Book Version Title: A Different World Dungeon Made with the Devil)

Bishop Bocca I of Yalta, who heard the news from the Adventurer's Guild of Vazari, was in a grumpy mood. It was already very grumpy.

(The young fool who was so hard to make... I ran at will and painted the name of my Yalta with mud...)

It is the brave man who has already been told that the formula for his death is strong that he is wearing the curse of a puffy bishop all by himself… now it is the culus of the former and brave.

After leaving the church in silence, this also seemed to be in return for the mention by taking the liberty of stepping into the "quicksand labyrinth". Moreover, unfortunately, they stopped by Barren's Adventurer's Guild (on purpose) in advance to declare that they would attack the dungeon. After twenty days, there was no tone out, so Barren's Adventurer Guild decided that there was a good chance of death.

(I didn't know there was any deception there could be if you died silently...... foolishly and politely proclaimed a dungeon offense to screw you......)

Assuming that the brave man became a non-returning guest after declaring a dungeon offense, the Adventurer Alliance cannot hide that information from a standpoint either. We'll have to publish it, but then the fact that even if Yalta's (...) contemporary braves once again defeated - following the Skeleton Dragon and now the dungeon opponent - will also be released. As for Yaltaism, which has only been accompanied by miso these days, he said that he would like to avoid further obscurity... politely and this time with the flower circle of death.

"Unreliable" Yaltanism, that's the kind of situation that seems to come with pillows.

The priest's temptation is to solve it. Besides, there's a continuation of this...

"If you think the fool brave is dead, you have to think about the cauldron... what's wrong?"

Tilt the cup after a relaxing, lonely word. It's not the kind of situation that you can think of in a primitive way. Mostly on the grounds that it's silly rather than because it's difficult.

"At a time when the dungeon is out..."

The hypothesis from Marcus, and modified (...) it - note. The episcopal perspective - it is in the present situation that the presence of the dungeon is being closed up by the Yaltan hypothesis. And in both hypotheses, dungeons - and now they are - are treated as beings hostile to humans. It is the defeat of the brave in that, but also the defeat of two generations later. It is a good (cool) subject to appeal to Yaltanism's weakness. There is no way that forces hostile to Yalta will not use this.

That brings me to the question of whether it would be good to appoint the next generation of brave men without any help. When the brave man appointed by Ringtone suffers defeat in standing, the public's eyes will also change.

But... that's why we have to appoint the next brave man at this time...

(Isn't that like declaring defeat to a dungeon...)

This can break the hearts and minds of the faithful who see Yaltanism as the outline of their request. Faith and trust in Yaltaism will be shaken.

(Will appointing the next brave man be a laugh, or will he be called a coward by dropping off his appointment...)

As long as it's done, even the bishop wants to get his hands on booze. No matter which way you fall, the detriment is unavoidable, with little profit. Plus, there are more problems...

(Signs that those who refuse to be appointed brave,?... to be honest, I can't help it)

A brave title with all the titles and little profit. And in exchange for that, he dives into a dungeon and loses his life... and it's not decided, but it's still not convincing to say no to the fact that the other two are killed in the dungeon to keep standing. Who can blame the species of life and those who flee?

(Back, back, back, back...)

To quell his anger at Callus, who sprang up again, the bishop took the glass in his hand again.