Full-time artistAuthor

Who else?

I don't know, I thought you Shen Jiarui was the author of "Roger's Mystery".

There are people in the circle who are slanderous, but they have to admit that there is nothing wrong with what Chu Kuang said before.

Worthy of being the number one Chu blow.

Of course, not all evaluations are good. As Granny’s most controversial work, "Roger's Mystery" does not say that the evaluation is polarized, but it is indeed a voice that I do not like——

"The narrative technique is too skinny. For the shocking effect of the ending, the splendor of the case was sacrificed.

"Obviously it is fooling the reader, or many people feel very happy to be fooled. It is really smart, but I don't like this kind of reasoning."

"I also don't like this writing method, but I also admit that this is indeed a new type of reasoning creation method. I can only pray that the writers I like will not follow the bad practices."

"The reasoning cannot be based on the unguessing criteria... The evil way of writing, I still like to reason with heart and soul instead of cooperating with the writer to play this kind of word game."

"It's really shocking at the end, but is it only for me that the first and mid-term look makes people sleepy?"

"Although it's really great, I can't accept this kind of narrative. There is a subtle emotion of [although curious, but I am being tricked], and it feels a bit bad."

"..."

There is a price to play with readers!

Because not everyone can accept this kind of play.

And there are different types of reasoning, and the narrative-type reasoning is precisely the "poison point" of some reasoning fans.

Grandma also encountered many doubts when she launched "Roger's Mystery", thinking that this article was unfair to readers, and that the emergence of new things is subject to controversy.

at this time.

It is not just some readers who feel that they have been poisoned too much, but also writers!

Yes, some reasoning writers felt that they had been teased after watching "Roger's Mystery", and they immediately cursed Chu Kuang after reading it.

Most swear words are done with just a few words on the mouth.

But even if there are writers, they are born with a desire to vent, such as the famous reasoning writer Leng Guang in Qi Province.

The cold light sprayed directly on the tribe:

"Since last night, someone has been recommending "Roger's Mystery" to me. I read it with anticipation. After reading it, I was very disappointed. I just want to say that this is a foul!"

It may be too much to say that it is too much, and the more wording is still euphemistic, but Lengguang is indeed very dissatisfied.

Leng Guang, a reasoning writer, is known for his outspoken words, and he also published a "five rules of reasoning."

This code is very popular in circles.

The first rule of the code: Detectives cannot solve cases in supernatural ways.

Rule 2 of the Code: When committing crimes, you cannot use uninvented poisons or devices that require profound scientific explanations.

Rule 3: Detectives must not solve cases based on clues that have not been prompted to readers in the novel.

Article 4 of the Code: Detectives must not become criminals.

Article 5 of the Code: Detectives must not use so-called intuition to determine cases

The first few articles are not controversial, and the circles are basically the default ones, because those few really make the work lose interest.

But the detective must not be a criminal, but some people ignore it.

There are some evil works in the reasoning world, and detectives are regarded as criminals.

Therefore, Leng Guang proposed the "Five Rules of Reasoning", but the fifth article was removed from the circle and turned into the "Four Rules of Reasoning".

This time, Leng Guang angered many insiders:

How can you remove the last clause of my code of reasoning without authorization?

Although "Roger's Mystery" does not use the detective as the criminal, the "I" from the first-person perspective is the criminal, but it is somewhat similar to the detective himself as the murderer.

So this is totally unacceptable for cold light!

However, Leng Guang’s criticism did not cause much repercussions, because Leng Guang is a well-known big fan in the reasoning world, everyone knows.

Everyone will not hate cold light too much.

Although this product loves to spray, it also has a bit of true temperament in it.

In fact, there are many reasoning writers on Earth who hate narrative inference creation techniques, and have openly complained about them, such as Quinn, who is only slightly less famous than his grandmother (Quin is a pen name shared by two people).

Of course Quinn didn't dare to complain about Granny, but he didn't like this way of writing.

But everything has two sides.

For example, the famous Keigo Higashino.

He wrote a work called Malicious, which is a typical narrative trick, paying tribute to his grandmother across the ages. It can be seen that Keigo Higashino recognized this creative technique.

Coincidentally.

In the same era, there were reasoning people who recognized "Roger's Mystery". This person is a monumental figure of Chu province reasoning writer, Carter!

Carter's reputation is much greater than that of Lengguang.

He commented on "Roger's Mystery" on the tribe, and he praised many words:

"The trick with words is a wonderful idea. When I read the fifth chapter to the bottom of the novel, I guessed the murderer, but this did not offset the shock I felt after watching the ending. This is really a genius idea. Chu Kuang created a new type of reasoning! I feel a little itchy and want to use this method to create once. Unfortunately, I haven't read Chu Kuang's other works before, but now I want to say something to Chu Kuang, Welcome to join the reasoning circle and look forward to your future creation of better works!"

The big guy's speech is very influential.

Some of Carter's readers, even if they don't like "Roger's Mystery", see the idol saying so, the balance in their hearts has gradually turned to Chu Kuang:

"Think about it, Mr. Carter said nothing wrong, this is a new type of reasoning."

"I saw a lot of people say that this style is disgusting. Look at the big picture of the big guy Carter and look at new things from multiple angles!"

"Big Carter can be said to have a big picture, because this type will cause countless follow-up works to imitate, which is actually a good thing for reasoning about future development."

"Unexpectedly, Big Carter would also like this book. Hey, I have the same taste as the idol."

"..."

The cold light left a message in the comment area: "Didn't agree."

Carter replied "^_^".

By the way, after Lengguang published the Five Laws of Reasoning, Carter took the lead in deleting the fifth rule.

At that time, Carter exaggerated the five rules published by Lengguang, saying that Xiaoguangguang you are awesome, and then turned his head and removed the fifth rule, which became the four rules widely circulated in the reasoning circle...

Leng Guang almost cried at that time.

He liked Carter very much, but this directly turned the luminescent powder into black.

Today, when Carter praised "Roger's Mystery", he had a cold light myocardial infarction.

And with the emergence of some controversy, the official microblog of Yinlan Library was also dispatched, directly adding an important note to this reasoning storm:

"Chu Kuang's masterpiece "Roger's Mystery" has opened up a precedent for narrative and sly inference. The so-called narrative is narrative. Nor can it conceal the brilliance of Chu Kuang's work!"

Of course, my own author is desperately praised!

Yinlan Library is also anxious to set the tone and make an established fact:

In the field of reasoning, Chu Kuang used narrative tricks to create a faction!

——————————

ps: I ask for a monthly pass.