Full-time artistAuthor

Faced with such an outstanding reasoning work as "Murder on the Orient Express", all reasoning writers can only sigh with the enchantment of this crazy Chu!

In fact, it’s hard to imagine that such a classic work that allows the Inference Association to score super high scores was actually produced by a writer with little inference experience——

Chu Kuang is indeed very productive.

He can write fantasy novels and is also very good at short stories. He is a genius writer recognized in the fiction industry across two major fields.

But to say that Chu Kuang really did inference creation was actually just a piece of "Roger's Mystery". As a result, when he entered the reasoning circle for the first time, Chu Kuang brought a gorgeous narrative storm!

As for the short story he released last month called "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falling", everyone did not pay too much attention.

To put it nicely, it is Chu Kuang's complement and enrichment of narrative;

To make it harder to say, this product is just boring, so I teased the readers. By the way, I took away a lot of blog contributions and made a lot of gimmicks.

Up to this point, the impression that Chu Kuang left on the reasoning circle was just a genius who relied on his talent to fool readers, tease readers, and play tricks.

And until Chu Kuang released "Murder on the Orient Express", all controversies in the reasoning circle were shattered in front of this work.

No one said that Chu Kuang was a frivolous treacherous narrator.

No one said that Chu Kuang was just using his talent to fool readers.

He is more like an occasional joke, in fact, a master of reasoning with a gap in his chest!

He almost completed a reasoning show that started in Poirot and ended with Poirot with a pious sense of ritual!

From narrative to tradition...

From the game to the classic book...

As a character throughout, Poirot has a tendency to become a god!

As the creator of Poirot, Chu Kuang has become the enchanting "newcomer" in the minds of writers in the reasoning circle!

Well, judging from the number of inference works, Chu Kuang is still a newcomer.

But this newcomer is too terrifying, and there is no reasoning that the writer is willing to use the term "newcomer" to describe Chu Kuang.

So the term "monster" is appropriate.

This is a name that belongs to Chu Kuang. Who makes it difficult for everyone to regard Chu Kuang as a newcomer? How can a newcomer have such a high starting point for his debut?

"Chu Kuang is a fuzzy belt in the reasoning circle. He is said to be a first-rate reasoning writer, and his works are all ranked in the top ten in reasoning. The result of the literary fight overwhelmed the cold light of being a first-class reasoning writer, but he is said to be Carter. That kind of top reasoning master, he only wrote two inferences! Well, I don’t think "Dong Dong Suspension Bridge Falling" is not a reasoning."

The industry has the habit of grading different writers.

But everyone found that Chu Kuang could not be graded.

His qualifications are too low, and the upper limit is too high. The current Chu Kuang just has too few works. No one knows what level Chu Kuang will be in the future.

Anyway, the cold light of the fiasco in this literary fight is a first-rate reasoning writer who is serious about it. This is one of the references for evaluating Chu Kuang.

Someone shook his head: "This wave of cold light hit a bit miserably."

Some people hold different opinions: "If you lose to the Murder on the Orient Express, it's not ashamed, because it's the same for everyone."

The former sighed: "But after all, I lost, and I became the background board of Chu Kuang."

The latter said seriously: "Have you not found that everyone didn't laugh at Lengguang? He did lose, but he showed his own level, but the opponent is too inhuman."

Just as the two sides were about to fight, a senior said:

"No one has the right to laugh at Leng Guang. One of the reasoning writers here is one of them. Anyone who goes up and fights the Murder on the Orient Express will have the same result."

"How?"

"All have to die."

The reasoning circle became silent.

Chu Kuang's "Murder on the Orient Express" is a work that is close to invincibility. As the predecessor said, it is not a question of cold light. Anyone who touches this novel will have to die.

...

Ripple continues to spread, and uses the reasoning forum as a starting point, eventually sweeping all major related platforms.

The official website of the Reasoning Association ranks in the top ten, and "Murder on the Orient Express" has been included.

The novel comment area is the same as other high-scoring reasoning styles, a bunch of rainbow farts.

"Chu Kuang's Murder on the Orient Express uses the purest traditional flavor, presenting a feast of reasoning to readers!"

"As more and more mystery novels in the book market begin to use similar routines, we often see a tragedy happen. The detective goes to the scene to do some investigations that no one can understand, and then do some mysterious investigations. Or simply disappeared for a few days to find clues. After that, the truth came to light and an amazing secret was revealed. As a reader, he could only sigh unclearly, and what Chu Kuang brought to readers was a fair duel between everyone and the detective. It is very rare to bring us humanistic thinking outside of the case."

"Yes, in order to make the ending unexpected enough, the authors' previous investigations, whether it was the case or the detective, were as incredible as they could be. So the ending is really amazing enough, but it always makes me think that what I read before is useless. , You only need to see the case and the last detective's interpretation. I feel that I am a complete idiot when I read the previous investigation part. I don’t understand anything. I just often see the mysterious smile of the detective. Everything is clear to my chest. ; And after the detective finally solved the secret, he finally understood what was going on."

"What about the duel between the reader and the detective?"

"Chu Kuang’s work is completely different this time. You don’t have to spend your time guessing what kind of investigation the detective has done. The author will put every step of the detective’s investigation and the evidence he obtained before the reader, allowing the reader and the detective to solve the case together. , I will participate in it unconsciously. The author will not embarrass readers in terms of professional knowledge, investigations or evidence, and try to make up for readers’ disadvantages in reading, providing readers with a platform for thinking, and then not making articles on investigations and other issues. , But truly achieved the plot’s bizarre twists and turns, and it is reasonable. Let readers guess, think, draw conclusions and overturn their own conclusions based on the development of the plot and the gradual increase of evidence, and then continue to guess, Thinking... Until the final answer is given, the reader's thinking has been evolving with the plot, and the answers given are both reasonable and must be unexpected. So I cannot help admire the author's meticulous thinking and ingenious design."

"I think those detective stories who dare not tell readers about the investigation, methods, and evidence of the case are nothing more than fear that readers will guess the results too early and lose interest in the story, but this should be explored in the story structure and plot, rather than playing tricks. Cleverly hides and deceives readers in disguise. He always likes to deify the detective. In fact, he does not put the readers on an equal position with the characters in the story. In this way, the readers will not only have no fun, but even more. It’s respect."

"After saying so much, in fact, in one sentence, Chu Kuang is a god."

The tone is a bit from the media, there is a suspicion of stepping on one hand, but it also revealed a fact in disguise:

Chu Kuang conquered discerning fans of traditional reasoning.

Not long ago, Chu Kuang had his reputation in the reasoning world at risk because of "Dong Dong Suspension Bridge Falling".

As a result, as soon as "Murder on the Orient Express" was released, the world seemed to change.

And in this world, one person will never change.

This person is the famous Chu Chuchu, Shen Jiarui, who said in the tribe: "It is said that Go has a god hand, and "The Murder on the Orient Express" is one of the gods of Chu Kuang!"

——————

ps: This chapter is coded in the hospital, and the status is affected. I will fix it later, everyone will wait for it.