Harry Potter and the Secret Treasures

Ravenclaw's crown is a symbol of wisdom, a legendary magical object.

It is said that the ancient spirits enchanted it, increasing the wisdom of the wearer.

At the bottom of the crown is the famous motto of Ravenclaw: Wit beyond measure is man's greatest treasure.

Now the crown is in Evan's hands, and he's worn it, and he doesn't feel sober or smarter.

In his view, this is a valuable historical monument, and of course there's Ravenclaw's own magic on it, but it's not magic that makes people smarter, it's something else that guides Ivan in his quest for the magic of time Titan.

That raven, no matter how Ivan did it, didn't reappear...

As for the notion that the crown is a symbol of wisdom, it is simply ridiculous.

It was Ivan's idea, but in the magic world, in the Middle Ages and in future generations, the wizards were convinced that this crown would bring unparalleled wisdom, and that it had been a symbol of the most intelligent wizard for centuries.

Rowena Ravenclaw was crowned because she was the smartest witch.

Conversely, she was recognized by the wizards as the smartest wizard because of her crown.

They are interdependent, mutually reinforcing and mutually reinforcing.

If the crown disappeared, would Ms. Rowena Ravenclaw still be the smartest witch?!

In particular, the crown was still stolen by her daughter, which was a complete scandal.

Whatever she proves, I'm afraid it's unclear, and Rowena and Ravenclaw's reputation will certainly be damaged.

It's hard to say if you'll lose your reputation, but you'll definitely be questioned.

At that time, several pureblood wizard families fomented public opinion behind their backs, and Ravenclaw's proposed bill would certainly not be passed this time.

This is a simple reasoning. If the Malfoy family gets a real crown from Barrow again, they might do more articles...

Because no relevant historical records were found, Ivan was not sure if this had really happened in history.

So, he doesn't know how Ravenclaw got screwed. Or is it a disgrace?

For now, it is certain that the crown was indeed stolen by Helena!

She stole the crown because she was jealous of her mother's wisdom and wanted to make herself smarter.

In the version of history that Ivan heard about, Helena stole the crown, and Ravenclaw was really sick and very sick, so she sent Barlow to find Helena, a man who had loved Helena deeply and had been hurt by her deeply, who eventually found Helena in the Albanian forest.

Barrow killed Helena there because he lost patience.

Then, because of remorse, Barrow stabbed himself with that knife, ending his life.

Shortly thereafter, Roina Ravenclaw also died of illness, no one knew the final whereabouts of the crown, no one knew who else had seen it, let alone whether it existed, and the crown had disappeared since then until Tom Riddle, a teenager, appeared...

Because it was dictated by the parties themselves, the story should be largely accurate.

But there are a few questions that are not clear, and they may just be a fragment of the whole story.

There are many things that are not clear, such as why Helena stole her mother's crown? Are you really jealous?

That would have made sense, but Ivan had just heard the two guys outside the door say that she wasn't supposed to be just jealous of her mother's wisdom, but running off with a witch from Muggle and stealing the crown before she ran away.

This explanation is more convincing than simply stealing the crown out of jealousy!

So the question is, who was that witch who ran off with Helena? Where is he?

In all the stories, he didn't show up.

It is an anomaly in itself that such an important figure has not appeared.

This is the first place that has not been made clear, and the second is that Helena stole the crown and hid it in a distant Albanian forest. If it was because she stole the crown and was afraid to hide, then it would be pointless for her to steal the crown. Neither would she dare publicly say that the crown was in her hands, nor would she be able to prove to the world in the forest that she was smarter than before, to show off her wisdom and not enjoy the benefits of stealing the crown.

Instead, it was a very stupid act.

Ivan himself went to the Albanian forest and knew what was going on there, how desolate and chaotic it was.

He has also been in contact with Helena's ghost many times, which is not familiar, but at least there is some understanding.

In Ivan's view, Helena would not have chosen to go to the Albanian forest, which would have been possible if she had gone to Greece.

Albanian forests are by no means a good place to hide and do not correspond to Helena herself.

If she went there to hide Barrow's search, it doesn't make sense, and it's weird.

As for the third question, Barrow finally found Helena's behavior.

It can be proved in every way that Barlow is a very bad temper, that he hates Helena because he loves her, but he is not without intelligence. Barlow is the favorite student of Salazar Slytherin, even if he can't marry Helena, and has a great future, but ultimately chooses the most drastic way to end his life.

Then, the ghosts of both of them eventually stayed in the world because of remorse and returned to Hogwarts...

After that, they lived together in school castles for thousands of years.

On the face of it alone, they do not seem to have much hatred, but rather to be able to live in peace.

Is it time to erase hatred? Or is there an unknown reason for them to finally reconcile?

After death, the two ghosts forgive each other, leaving only endless remorse.

Barlow regrets that he became demented, sometimes sober, sometimes stuck because of his impulse to kill his beloved woman.

Helena regretted that she had betrayed her mother and stolen the crown, but nonetheless, when she returned to Hogwarts, she insisted on not telling the whereabouts of the crown, not telling the rest of the Ravenclaw family, and not telling the other founders.

Until the world forgot about it!

Oh, by the way, because Ravenclaw's hiding, no one else may know about the loss of the crown.

But Helena doesn't say anything. Can you explain the past? She's a ghost. What's the use of that crown?

The whole thing leaks anomalies, and there's a lot of illogical things.

Thinking about it, looking back at what happened to Helena and Barlow is a very flawed story.

Ivan smelled a conspiracy in there, and he could tell that it wasn't that simple.

How can you say, there must be a big secret behind this...