Helping with Adventurer Party Management

Is it originally a wine presser or juicer?

It was a way of applying pressure using thick wood screws, which had changed their appearance for a long time with Gorgogo modifications.

First, the number of wood screws to exert pressure on the printing surface was increasing.

There are four wooden screws that were one, which is a huge increase. One can only print a small picture, so it seems to have increased the number to print the notebook size I request.

It may be a cheap idea, but being able to print in larger sizes means that you can print in larger sizes the precise copper prints that the baron draws.

As a matter of fact, isn't the impact on the arts great?

So far, I don't have any stories to take there, but maybe I can talk to the Baron and Jilboa who plan to expedite to observe the Cannibal Titans.

◇ ◇ ◇ ◇ ◇

"You're going out for a bit!

And say no, it's Sarah's team leaving the office.

The general policy seems to solidify and go investigate the dossier first.

Around here, Sarah's team she was on during her last Easter education clearly has an advantage.

On the other hand, the other team seems to be prolonged in their argument.

There are two reasons why meetings continue that are inconclusive and unable to make decisions.

Firstly, if there are a large number of non-human participants who make decisions. I mean, it's a meeting where people, like critics, say opinions but are unwilling to take decisions or responsibilities.

Sometimes you need to hear your opinions, so it's a good idea to leave people with no right to make decisions.

However, there won't be any problems of this kind this time, as this is a team of three and a few.

It also meant that instead of the six of us moving together, we left it at three.

It's a strange thing, and the human population begins to come up with decision free riders when there are more than four.

And it is said that up to eight people can make constructive arguments.

Organizations that are able to make decent decisions are largely contained to about eight people per group.

Another reason is if you simply don't have enough information (input) to make a decision.

Genius commanders and entrepreneurs can sometimes derive the right direction with very little information, but ordinary people don't.

It's only natural to gather some information, right or left, before you run out.

An argument that is grand when there is not enough information is not lost, it is just troubling.

If it bothers you, you should use your legs to get information first.

Balancing decision-making and information-gathering around here is difficult.

I can count on you if you're just being discreet, and if you're too careful, you can't do anything.

Through trial and error, we just have to find the best balance for our organization.

However, people belonging to larger organizations are something that makes them conservative, so as managers, they have mechanisms in place to reduce the size of each organization or raise people who make decisive decisions to top positions so that it is easy for everyone to make decisive decisions.

Watching the other team argue while sitting around also sounds like they're arguing something that sounds pretty good, but I also feel like re-burning what I just heard.

Well, it's also the first day, and it could be interesting to make a difference between a team that moved and a team that didn't.

Making them compete also makes it easier for them to reflect on and reflect on the actions of their teams.

I also often notice things that I don't notice when I'm told from above, by looking to the side.

How much can you overlap "awareness" around it?

The growth of the impromptu officials depends on it.