Helping with Adventurer Party Management

Episode 358: Explanatory Power

For three days, he watched as he ran the shoe business, comparing the actions of two teams.

There were a lot of things that made me want to pinch my mouth, but I won't answer until they ask me.

Asked, I won't tell you anything more than asked.

It may have been unfriendly, but it has my own nurturing guidelines and intentions.

I want them to grow up as officials, but in order to create an autonomous organization, you can't create a relationship from the beginning where I teach them and they learn.

Gather information on your own feet, deepen understanding through discussion, and realize for yourself.

I want you to wear such an autonomous learning process.

Interesting, the two teams should have gathered people of roughly the same level of competence, but there is a marked difference in behavior.

The team Sarah belongs to, assuming they call it Team A, but they look aggressive going out and collecting a variety of materials and testimonies. Most importantly, he doesn't seem to be very good at organizing and outputting information.

The shelves I have prepared for my team are stacked with messy copies of parchment paper and wood-cut boards, and I'm not sure what information I'm gathering beside them.

If I had sensitive material, it wouldn't be good, so I asked Gorgogo to make a simple lock and crate, to put in the material I collected there, and to move it to the office at night.

Team B, on the other hand, seems to be moving forward in a style where the clergy Claudio is at the centre to deepen the debate. Compared to Team A, it looks like he's making a solid investigation plan and then starting an investigation.

The collected material is small when compared to the A-Team, but the material is well organized and the wooden planks are bracketed with strings.

Team B comes to me with a lot of questions. What do you think of our plans? Looks like they're exploring our intentions, such as where we think the materials to investigate are.

Emotionally, I want to flatter Sarah from Team A, but I also want to appreciate the right move as an organizer from Team B.

At the end of the day, which approach is the right one would look at and evaluate the results.

◇ ◇ ◇ ◇ ◇

"Well, why don't you explain what you've accomplished for three days"

By the time the workshop closed, I decided to have two teams explain the results of the three days of activity.

Let's start with Claudio and the others.

As the first side to explain, nominate a B team.

In that order, once and for all, there are intentions.

The ability to explain would be helpful if you were motivated by Team A, as Team B obviously looks more expensive.

With a nomination, the clergyman Claudio rises.

After all, the explanation seems to be done by him in the priesthood.

You also need to be smart to explain complicated things easily, but more places say things than that.

Since general education is not widespread in this world, opportunities to explain one's views to unspecified human beings are limited, especially to civilians

If we want to acquire such skills in the civilian population, we have no choice but to lead a mercenary regiment like Zilboa or educate him as a priest.

Explanatory skills are rare (rare) skills in this world.