Helping with Adventurer Party Management

The debate ensued.

Claudio is the logic of governance. Sarah is the logic of an adventurer.

Top down and bottom up.

I'm not talking about which is better and which is wrong.

That's why there was no superiority or inferiority to the argument, and each other never gave way to the claim.

I speak up because my general opinion has been exhausted and my claims have begun to loop.

"Is it time?

As you realize once again that I was there, everyone's gaze gathers.

That would mean we were so focused and arguing.

"Well. I think we've largely exhausted each other's claims. What do you say?

Everyone nodded, so keep talking.

"How will we govern the territory from now on? I would like to thank everyone for seriously discussing that methodology. And I believe it is my own responsibility and gratitude to lead this debate to the design of practice without ending it with a debate for discussion.

From now on, I would like to state my policy on the way in which deputies govern.

In defining the policy, everyone's findings were very helpful.

Of course, I'm always ready to hear from you if you have different opinions about the policy you're going to state. "

Let's start by assessing against the investigative activities and remember to say that it helped.

In a word that it was helpful, it leads to my people's listening attitude and motivation for the future.

When a superior speaks, he or she always needs respect and feedback.

In polar terms, there's no point in speaking as a superior if you don't have those two points.

I see they've got an attitude to listen to, and go on.

"First, the premise is that the territory is away from the city.

And as a deputy, I plan to do both the management of the territory and the management of the shoe business in the city in parallel.

That's why we're looking for an efficient way to govern that sees two things on its own.

Although it is a finding, so far the territory you receive from the Nicolo Priest does not appear to be very well governed.

The rationale is assumed from the fact that in recent years there have been more than one young man who has become an adventurer despite the alleged absence of extraordinary improprieties and failures, from the fact that the task of driving back monsters is supposedly to the villagers as a substantial exemplary, and from the fact that no problems have been reported.

There is no territory without problems. The reported absence of problems means that they are gripping the problem or do not recognize the problem as a problem.

This may be a matter of personal qualities of deputies, but it is also a matter of management methods.

I feel the need to devise ways in which even deputies of mediocre qualities can recognize the problems that are happening now.

Where is the problem that is happening now?

It is in the fact that the peasants are exposed and it will be in the problem solved by the adventurers.

It must be recognised once again that having no problems with the documents does not guarantee that there are no problems "

Up to this point, everyone is listening seriously.

It's just a world of spirituality so far.

From here, instructions must be dropped further down to the level of work to talk.