Helping with Adventurer Party Management

Talk to the new officials who are taking a break to shape the earlier thoughts.

Let's start with understanding the reality.

"What do you think? Anything troubling you?

A thankful boss for a busy field is a boss who supports the field.

Information stops coming up as soon as I'm limited to pushing work, being useless except complaining.

Sometimes executives of a company who often had a scandal say the words "I didn't hear them, I didn't know them," but it is a testament left that was thought to be "just futile to report" and should be ashamed of.

"It's okay."

Paperino replied that there was no problem, but I can say that I would disqualify as an administrator if I believed the words as they were.

Participants, operators, what is spoken, everything is a first time event, so there's no way we haven't had a problem.

The "OK" answer is likely either that the person thinks the problem is occurring but not a big one, or overlooks the problem that is occurring itself.

So change the question from vague to qualitative (just).

"How many people are announcing now?

"You two."

"That's a slow eye progression. Does it still feel like you're having a hard time explaining?

"No, the argument has been incandescent since the first..."

As the questions step into specifics, the answers become more specific as well.

"I don't know. Should the debate also proceed in parallel? Or should I just explain first? I'm going to change the timing and timing according to the actual situation."

In response, when this one showed a supportive attitude, Paperino looked open.

"Anything?"

"No. I just thought they'd scold me to proceed as first explained,"

Sure, as an appointment, we were supposed to go through an explanation before entering into a debate, but if everyone has a high level of understanding of the cause, we don't mind getting into a debate just now, so it's a fall in the book to ignore the reality and move on as planned.

"However, there are concerns that you won't be able to see the whole picture when the debate continues from the beginning. How do I follow up around there?

Communicate your concerns and ask them to think about what they can support here.

"Right. Even if you get a good idea, it may flow while you're arguing, and even if you come up with an idea for improvement at the end, you don't feel like the idea of disappearing in the middle of a refinement."

I see. In short, I understand that you want to change the way experts debate each other's outputs.

I see value not only in the final improvement idea, but also in the intermediate deliverables along the way.

"Change your mind a little bit."

Competition as well as intermediate deliverables shall be subject to competition and prizes in the presentation of final deliverables.

Looks like we need to think about that trick.

Put your arms together often and think about the descriptions and steps to prepare the necessary tools.

Is there anything you can do right now that is not burdensome, easy to understand and easy to do on the field?

"You're going to figure it out."

To sum up my thoughts, I decide to ask the church to bring in artisans from the office.