Hollywood legendary director

"Roman Polanski won the nomination for best director. His character has nothing to do with art, let alone affect the Oscar selection."

"The Pianist was nominated for seven awards, and the Oscar judges expressed a clear attitude of favor. What will the final result be?"

"Nicole Kidman vs. Renee Zellweger, who can get the best actress?"

""Chicago" is huge and has unlimited scenery."

"Hollywood starts the Harvey-Weinstein era? Is it a vision or what to be nominated for Oscar for Best Picture?"

"The All the Time" has caused controversy? In order to ensure Nicole Kidman's competitive advantage, he helped Meryl Streep to declare the best supporting actress?"

......

Over the years, the Oscar nomination list has always grabbed a wave of entertainment headlines, and this year is no exception. On the second day of the nomination dinner, all relevant newspaper press releases have been published.

However, what is slightly different from previous years is that compared with awards such as Best Picture, Best Male Lead or Female Lead, people's attention this year is undoubtedly on a controversial movie like "The Pianist".

The director's evil behavior obviously made them feel uncomfortable. What's more uncomfortable is that the nomination advantage of "The Pianist" is still very good?

"Can it really get a big prize?" All the gossip sections are concerned about this issue, because this kind of thing is really too topical to discuss.

When various newspapers made predictions about the attribution of this year’s Oscars, the gambling company also opened a corresponding handicap: Roman Polanski’s winning odds rose slightly after the scandal broke out, reaching as high as 1. : 2.5. This shows that they are also very optimistic about the award for the tainted director. After all, the Academy judges of the Oscars don't know what they are going crazy, they are very supportive.

In the battle for the best director, another popular candidate to win the award is Martin Scorsese of "New York Gangs" with an odds of 1:3, which is 0.5 points more than Roman Polanski. .... In addition, the odds of the escorts in the eyes of the other three gambling companies are all 1:5 or 1:10 or more. This also shows how the professionals in the circle think about this award. Assessed.

And Harvey-Weinstein’s Miramax’s top picks have always been the best film, which is also in line with their company’s profit maximization considerations. Of course, this is also something that the industry knows.The gambling company's daring to make this odds evaluation also shows their self-confidence. They have always had great abilities.

And the odds of "Three Fools in Bollywood" in the best foreign language film handicap are even more amazing, at 1:1.5, the odds...Zhi, I don’t know, I thought they were just The public relations team behind it is more confident than the CAA.

However, it also means that they are really optimistic that the film can go to the end, because "Three Fools Havoc in Bollywood" is a typical work with strong regional atmosphere, which has a certain degree in the selection of the best foreign language film. Advantages, and more importantly, CAA and Paramount Pictures are supporting such a film.

Is it for "outsiders" or half of "owners", do I still choose this option?Especially those old stubborn academics who like to engage in local characteristics and treat differently.

Take the famous "Jewish" theorem.

Actors of Jewish ancestry can always get a lot in Oscars and get more performance opportunities than others.

Many people are rumoring that half of Hollywood is controlled by Jewish forces. This is not a lie.

They are also more willing to help their own people. This seems unfair to many people, but it is a means by which Jews live in Hollywood, in the United States, or elsewhere.

Although it is inevitable that there will be discrepancies, but the Jewish group is well-known, especially in the showbiz, where personal connections can better determine the allocation of resources.

It has become an instinct for them to help each other. For example, Harvey Weinstein, he can have such an influence on the Oscars, not only is good ability, but also the role played by blood and the same ethnicity during this period. But it is extremely important.

Similarly, there are Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson. Their smooth and open actor careers also illustrate this point.

As for why the two of them are not like Jewish people, it is because the ethnic view that the Jews agree with depends on the matrilineal line. By coincidence, their mother is Jewish, but their father is not.

Counting on this phenomenon, Marilyn Monroe, Gotti Han, Kate Hudson, and many other actresses are outstanding.

It is undeniable that their strength and beauty, but the most important thing is still the continuous support of the nobles.

This sense of cultural identity and intimacy is self-evident, and it can't even be said of cheating or anything. People simply put it on the surface.

If it weren't for the Jewish descent this year, and no candidate for the Oscar, it is estimated that Nicole Kidman would have to accompany him as he did in previous years, witnessing the award falling to those who are not as good as her.

Wasn't the title of the most beautiful Oscar queen won by Gwyneth Paltrow? Well, she is Jewish.

Just as China has a serious sympathy for the hometown, in the ancient officialdom, the township party was a powerful political force, and people in large groups have always been willing to survive in groups.

"There is no party in the party, imperial thought, no faction in the party, all kinds of weird..." These words of the great man are really the most logical saying.

In immigrant countries like the United States, no township culture was born, but racial identity was replaced.

All races will naturally come together to form a community of closely related interests, holding as many resources as possible in society for the foothold and development of such a community, and among all races, or in the United States, Jews and blacks are The most grouped, this is mainly because they are in a relatively weak state in the overall environment.

Black people don't say much, because their racial awakening is relatively late, and they have only slowly begun to show their strength in the recent period, but their nationality also determines that it will be difficult for them to achieve success in the general environment, so they have to fight together.As for the Jews, such things have happened in modern times, and being excluded, discriminated against, and disgusted once became commonplace, so they have to be grouped, and their ethnic culture also emphasizes this point, that is, in such a grouping culture, They gradually gained influence and also occupied a certain dominant position in Hollywood.

Of course, this is not to say that after entering Hollywood, any Jew can achieve both fame and fortune without worrying about eating and drinking, but that this group of people may be able to obtain extra benefits that are generally difficult to obtain by relying on his blood. Kind of opportunity.

For example, Oscar. After you get nominated with a certain amount of strength and luck, you can play the emotional card. Those Jewish judges subconsciously maintain the interests of their race, and Harvey Weinstein also relies on it. This kind of trick has achieved his future influence.

This is unbelievable at first, and it is hard for outsiders to believe that Oscar is so golden, why is it so?

But the fact is that this is true in the eyes of the academic judges. Just like those big stars, outsiders feel "unclear" no matter how they look at them. For example, in the entertainment industry, outsiders don’t know much about it. When you step in, you will discover how dirty the circle is and how many transactions are clearly marked.

This is not surprising, because the actor industry is not tied to academic qualifications and knowledge, nor does it blend in with literacy and moral standards.

In fact, those who have too much bottom line and morality are not easy to get ahead.

Getting out of the silt but not staining it is something that Lotus can do. The average person has no background or anything, and doesn't want to "combine with each other". Who will take you to play?

These Oscar judges are not professional judging machines supported by the association. They are people and individuals. They will have their own social relations and personality tendencies. This means removing their subjective thoughts and objectively following their profession. It is very difficult to vote according to the standard of

Let alone racial prejudice, gender prejudice, appearance prejudice, subject prejudice, value prejudice... all the prejudices that contain subjective forms are flooded with more than 1,000 people of all kinds.

Although according to the voting rules announced by the academy, it is forbidden to pass the ticket, and to discuss things in private, but almost no one asks for votes or votes.

The tricks of Oscars are too numerous to list, and a large part of the judges are veteran qualifications from the 70s and 80s, or beyond.

Do you think that when they get old, they will become incompetent, and suddenly they begin to become obsessed with film art?It's impossible at all, and even if there are, how many people can have such an awareness.

The ballots are in their hands, they are just tickets used to seek benefits. As for who to vote, it doesn't matter.

Since the judges themselves do not respect the so-called Oscars, those insiders who also want to achieve some interest demands are even more unwilling to respect and maintain the principle of fair competition.

However, they did not dare to do too much. Since entering the 1980s and entering the star age, Oscar's whitewashing work has also improved a lot, and it looks like that.

"Three Fools in Bollywood" is in such a big environment, without departing from the development of CAA for its Olympic plan.

Lehman also got busy. Under the guidance of Kevin Hoween, he called the judges who might be wooed to help the film awards, and promised them benefits.

This is the simplest means of fighting, but the most effective.

Maybe other competitors are doing the same thing. In the end, it's just who is better.

As for the work itself, it might have been forgotten long ago...

————