Hollywood legendary director

The sun has already set.

The law and order in Los Angeles is not good, so Bella quickly returned to the hotel where she was staying after watching the movie.

At this moment, when opening the document, she only felt that she had something to write in her mind, but she really started writing, but she didn’t know where to start--

She frowned and wanted to think about a better place to break the problem.

The change in the protagonist's mindset, the shamelessness of the man in the suit, and even the inaction of the government that the film alludes to... These are all points that can be written.

But the problem is that most of the characters portrayed in the film are egoists, and rarely have that kind of very positive stance-Angie doesn't count, the child's mind is immature.

Perhaps, to generalize more comprehensively?

Bella thought for a long time, and finally got the right idea.

She sat in front of the computer and typed on the keyboard to narrate her film review of "New York Trip".

The title is-we can be humble like dust, not twisted like maggots.

...

"I'm a person who doesn't like watching disaster movies very much, because this kind of subject is very easy to limit the creator's thinking, and the theme of the whole article basically cannot escape the three words'to live'.

Either the desire to survive is more than everything, and the protagonists live; or it is meaningful to set how the protagonists die.

Obviously, if disaster films want to create characters, they can only work in these two directions, but the point is that the same theme makes it more difficult to highlight the highlights.

To put it bluntly, so many successful disaster movies, such as "Independence Day" and "Alien" series, how many characters can be remembered?

There is not much novelty.Wei Guangzheng has too many people to set up, and I get bored, and I can't touch it too far away.

But "New York Tour" is different.

There are always people who think that the world is black and white, but they ignore gray.

Jingwei is not good enough, and the one-sided portrayal of the role is even thinner and foolish.

It can be said that most of the characters in "A Trip to New York" are often encountered in reality.Regardless of the background setting, it will be a trial field that emphasizes the depiction of'human nature'.

For example, in the movie, as soon as the protagonist Jack appears on the stage and the zombies are half of their carriage, he can very cruelly shut the strong man and his pregnant wife outside the door. This door is equivalent to the two in Jack’s heart. Those who didn't run fast enough were sentenced to death by themselves.

If it weren't for the strong hands and feet, he would definitely have to die from the mouth of a zombie, and it would not be too much to be scolded as a scum.

But can he be considered bad?No way.Put yourself in the situation and think about it. The unknown infected person bites when they see someone, and rushes over here. In that critical situation, who can make the most unselfish choice?

In fact, this is mostly true in reality, and it is often the more lacking, the more advocating.

Isn't it just because we advocate being selfless and taking care of the overall situation, it is becoming more and more valuable?

The fact is that people's hearts are unpredictable. When faced with a choice between life and death, people will always reveal the truest choice in their hearts.

Therefore, it cannot be said that Jack's choice is wrong, nor can he be said to be correct.

Opening the door can indeed save the two people faster, but the risk factor is too high. What if the zombie breaks through, what should the people in the carriage, including the daughter Anji, do?

At that time, it was safer not to open the door than to open the door. It was that simple.

There is nothing wrong with self-interest, but it is hard to be used to others.

For example, the transformation of the protagonist Jack is also Angie, and a kind of atonement for self;

Another example is a cheerleader who would rather risk being rejected with his beloved, rather than follow the wave;

Also, a strong man with a sense of responsibility, the life of the loved one is more important than anything...

These roles can make people feel good, but they are also based on protecting the people around them. They are self-help and cannot be said to be selfless.

As for the executive man in the big villain suit portrayed in the movie, he is also an egoist. Is there any difference from the above?

Everyone is asking for a living, and the fault lies. He likes to let others give their lives.

Also pretend to be full of benevolence and morality, manipulate people's hearts.

This is what makes him sick. There is nothing wrong with trying to survive, but he can't interfere with others' lives!

Mobilizing a group of people to force another group to die, and also suffocating the humanity of the survivors around them in order to live little by little is the most vicious concept in this film.

At every turning point of the plot, this extremely selfish man can send the most precious assists.

Urge the train conductor to start as soon as possible; provocatively refuse to open the door; bewitched the train conductor to go out first to attract the zombies; unable to escape, push the cheerleader to the zombies who were chasing after him; until the end, he could kill the driver who came to save him, and Jack died together.

It can be said that he is one of the best characters (smiles).

In addition to the characters, in the movie, the zombie scenes that are rushing to the face and heartbeat are equally powerful. The special effects and the combination of the service show the full and shocking visual effects, and the director's portrayal of people's fragile performance in the face of disasters and panic is even more impressive.

Reality is often more cruel than imagined, and there has never been a so-called aura of immortality for the protagonist.

Although, I don't want Jack to die (laugh)."

The film review is finished.

After checking it again, Bella quickly sent it to the reviewing editor.

...

Late at night, the mansion of Beverly Hills.

Lyman leaned on the head of the bed, holding Eva in his arms, who had just finished exercising, sweating slightly, and unconsciously rubbed her right hand on her smooth back.

"It's a few hours before the end of the zero o'clock show and the box office at the midnight show. Or go to bed first, and you can find out tomorrow." Eva looked at his slightly tired face and suggested.

"Can't sleep, if you are sleepy, go to sleep first, I'm waiting." Lyman touched her cheek.

He is now a frightened bird, for fear that some news will not be conducive to "New York Tour".

why?It's really short of money.

The acquisition of Lismanvesh Films almost exhausted the liquidity of Firefly Films. In order to immobilize Ryan’s private property, he repaid personal loans of more than 100 million yuan. You have to think about who to sell shares for hematopoiesis.

Warner, Paramount, Lionsgate... the three partners that often deal with have all moved to win.

And if "New York Tour" is strong, Firefly Pictures and Blue Butterfly Pictures still have more than 30 million US dollars on the books to maintain stability, and they can support the WB TV station to share the revenue of "Prison Break" ---

There is not much difference between the TV circle and the film circle, but it always needs to divide the profits batch by batch.

The first batch is the proceeds of more than 20 million purchases of broadcasting rights.

When the bulk of advertising costs and the offline market are not yet shared, it is estimated that the money will not be seen until March next year.

The company's daily expenses and film announcements cannot be delayed, so it is necessary to "act by chance." You can't look at what's wrong with the company's capital chain. For this reason, people have to accept some sand.