King of Hollywood

Hollywood shit.

I saw someone in the book review area asking about the diving rules and the x-trade. I happened to have written a story about this before, but I didn't finish it. Now I can flip it out and put it down here.

What I want to say is, this is my personal opinion, and it doesn't mean that anyone can't guarantee 100 percent correctness, just look at it.

In addition, there is a point that I have already mentioned in the novel. Again, you cannot trust or disbelieve the information collected. What you see is just what the media wants you to see, how to tell the truth from it, which requires you to distinguish it carefully yourself.

Whether it's the Hollywood Revelations at the dawn of Zhou, the Hollywood Diving Rules published by the Americans, or any documentary. If you look at several books, several documentaries, neither seek proof nor think, put them into jewelry at once, and believe nothing about them, then there are only two words to describe: idiot!

For example, some people like to move out the words of an American actress, Vincent, when they talk about it, but what about it? Not to mention how famous and credible this so-called actress is. It's really easy to refute those words, as we'll talk about shortly. And here I just want to point out, if you're a Chinese director, you go to the United States, and the other reporter asks you if there are a lot of X deals in the Chinese entertainment industry, what would you say? I think most of them are: some, but not many, basically good. Isn't it?

Nobody trivializes their industry in front of the media, unless they don't want to get mixed up, let alone Hollywood, which exports its value to the outside world. How can you not pack it to a bright spot? Of course, when you do go to Hollywood, they'll turn around and tell you what to do. Don't think Americans have a simple head. You might as well go to the Hollywood Bed.

So, how do we tell the most basic truth when we can't establish it? Logic!

It's a simple logic that, as early as primitive society, there were women who traded mating rights for more food from men, and in thousands of years of history, there were many examples of women who traded their bodies for profit. Could it take decades for a system to change all this?

When the new China was founded, it used the power of the government to make all the prostitutes good, but there were rumours that women traded their bodies for the privileged classes, let alone the United States, which is known as "free” because of capital domination?

So we can come to the first conclusion that in Hollywood, the x-trade is absolute.

So the second question, how big is it? What are the benefits to women? My personal view is that this is a pervasive phenomenon and that the benefits are, at least, much more than the costs paid.

Let's first talk about the development of Hollywood x trading, basically in the '50s,' 60s and '70s, which was the most prosperous time, when large companies concentrated on publishing, producing, screening and other functions, and the control over actors was also very tight, and naturally arranged whatever they wanted.

Daryl? When Zanuk was in charge of Fox, a beautiful actress was always sent to his office at 4 p.m. every day, and if the actresses refused Zanuk, they would not be able to continue working in Fox. These actresses are called "The Four O'Clock Girls," which is also common with the Hollywood tycoons. And many companies have a dedicated women's corner selection room, so there's no need to say much about its use.

Gary Grant probably slept with more women than you've ever seen, Grace? Kelly is also known as sleeping all the way to the top, and is said to be able to tuck her fingers into her arms.

This situation continued to change after the late 1970s, when, first, large companies were gradually dismembered as a result of antitrust laws; secondly, women were constantly fighting for their rights and status had begun to rise; and finally, * * * crimes had been established.

There are many more, but these three points should be the most important. So, did that eliminate Hollywood's x-trade? The answer is no. What do we do in America when something becomes illegal? Make it legal!

If it's not clear, then political contributions should always be known, right? This thing is actually a bribe in a legal coat, and although there is a monetary cap, it's too easy to get around.

What about the x-trade in a legal coat? Yeah, that's the one I wrote in the book review section. One-night stand!

Times are changing, as are the ways and means of trading, the only thing that remains the same is the fact that the body trades for profit.

So let's move on to the next topic, and let's start by saying that big companies have been dismembered.

A lot of people should know what Rockefeller did in the face of antitrust prosecutions, apparently dismembered, but still secretly controlled by decentralized holdings.

The same goes for Hollywood movie companies, even if they can't hold exhibits, they can't choose to produce and distribute the same company, but they can always go around, can they? These companies are inextricably linked to each other, which is more troublesome than ever, and the Hollywood tycoon is still the tycoon.

Let us then turn to the advancement of women.

But what we're going to talk about here is actually something that goes hand in hand with the advancement of women, which is * * *. Regarding the confusion among young Americans * * *, the portrayal of them in the Agan Monument is somewhat pertinent.

After the * * * seventies and eighties, American women have become very accustomed to things with men * * *, and while Americans are not * * like their movie TVs overall, conservative women are also many, but there is basically no such woman in Hollywood.

You have to understand, it's a place of paper drunkenness, a place of fame, where temptation is much more than elsewhere, and if you're lucky, you get a much higher reward than you pay, why expect women there to be as pure as angels? They either had dreams when they first arrived, but the reality would soon wake them up.

There are, of course, some women who are good at cleansing themselves, but this so-called good at cleansing is certainly not comparable to those who are good at cleansing themselves in the United States, just relative to those who are wandering, plus * * good protection - don't look too high on paparazzi.

Well, let's get back to it, since they don't take it personally with men * * *, why don't they do that if they can get a chance with men * * *? Always remember, it's the character that makes the actor, not the actor that makes the character.

Of course, with the development of the times, ideas and means are also developing, and if there is any positive effect on the development of these decades, it is from compulsion to your desire.

Forced to stop, Zanuk's example is right in the front, but by now, the tycoon is good, the producer is good, the director is good, and wanting to be with an actress * * * necessarily takes time to collude, yes, that's the word. If the actress feels that she can develop and the other person doesn't hate it, then naturally, it's the same.

One advantage of this is that even if you are photographed pairing up with a producer, director, or tycoon, you can announce that you are dating and dating. Anyway, with the pace of life getting faster, it is normal to change your boyfriend on both ends for three days.

It is also because of this that the content of the deal has changed, from being a director, producer, tycoon * * * in exchange for a solid role, to widening channels.

For example, if a director or producer, after various auditions, thinks two actresses are appropriate, and everyone else agrees that one is slightly worse than the other, but has slept with the director or producer, who do you think the director would insist on using?

You can see here how ridiculous the online interview with American actress Vincent about the Hollywood X deal is and how easy it is to bypass the tripartite checks and balances. Another example, Woody? Alan, would the investor refuse to use an actress to perform his own work?

As for the so-called profit story, let's just say, what if the actress of Transformers wasn't Megan? Fox, it's another vase with a face. Does the movie make a difference?

As you can see, in Hollywood, those big investment actresses are basically vases, especially in recent years, that anyone can do with a little bit of acting. Medium-invested, how do you normally relate to decision-makers, whether you've ever had a one-night stand, can play a decisive role in auditions. As for independent films, that's all the more so, independent film directors, especially the most famous ones, who don't have the so-called Red Faces and Muses, and nobody really thinks that these Red Faces or Muses are just spiritual, right?

The so-called director of fame * * * is even more ridiculous, and it goes without saying that Americans need to remain loyal when they marry. Although those millionaires are excluded, the middle class still retains this habit, and fame does have some restraint on this.

But if you're single, you don't have to think about it. A careful analysis of the conversation shows that it mentions a * * * very rich word. In short, the ones listed above are * * * rich, not X trades.

Of course, actresses can also choose to refuse, but in that case, take their time, perhaps on that day they will be famous for a discreet independent film, or for the role of the elderly in old age.

As for the * * * of the three points I mentioned earlier, unfortunately, it's not established in Hollywood, it's very simple, if you need an actress * * audition - no doubt, absolutely - and shooting a passionate play * * * on the set, is this really a * * *?

If an actress dares to sue a director or producer or whoever * * * wins or loses, she will never hang out in Hollywood again, and I don't think that actress will make that bet.

So, under the one-night stand, now Hollywood, the x-trade literally is gone, just like the corrupt * * in the U.S. government literally is gone, but what is actually going on, I think a little bit of the brains will understand.

In short, logic is always one of the criteria by which you judge the credibility of a thing without more and more conclusive evidence and information. If you cross a few messages, watch a few documentaries, completely believe and be true without thinking and mocking, then there are only two words to describe: idiot!

In fact, even the Americans themselves have not avoided the x-trade, and they themselves are working on the x-trade. Remind me again that I've asked my friends in Los Angeles for confirmation by transferring a "Hollywood bed”.