Movies with historical themes, especially if they want to talk about serious history, the truth is necessary.

When Qiao Feng invited Spielberg to shoot Jinling Thirteen Hairpins, Spielberg refused at first. The reason for his refusal was that he was a foreigner, and he did not understand the sufferings suffered by the Chinese, and he could not empathize with him. Only a Chinese director can make such a story well.

However, unfortunately, until the time and space before Qiao Feng's soul passed through, no director could really tell the tragic scenes that happened in Jinling City.

Regarding the Jinling Massacre, I have talked about a lot of TV movies, but to talk about it specifically, Qiao Feng knows only two of the more influential movies, one must be the Jinling 13 hairpins of Lao Mouzi, and the other The part is Jinling, Jinling!

But it is a pity that the films of these two people have many problems in Qiao Feng's eyes, and many places are too much for granted.

Just like Spielberg pointed out, the Japanese army led a group of Japanese soldiers into the church even with the strong resistance of Father Engman. They asked the choir girls to sing for them in the military camp in the name of celebrating Christmas.

At this inescapable moment, a group of "special women" headed by Yumo came forward. There were 13 of them. Under the cover of night, everyone had a mortal heart and a hidden weapon in their bodies, and successfully replaced Shangri The young girls followed the Japanese army.

In Lao Mouzi's movies, they went to death generously.

But how could it be possible that the prostitutes will not spare their lives if their lives are not their lives? Is it because their lives are as cheap as grass?

This is too fake.

Too justice, too stalwart.

Is there such a person?

Have.

Of course there is.

But to say that the 13 people are all like this, they are all just and majestic, not to mention that they can't win the trust of others, even the screenwriters themselves may not believe them.

And in Yan Geling's another extended version, which Spielberg thinks is more reliable, this paragraph is quite different.

Only Zhao Yumo was righteous: "Let's go with the Japanese. Keep the students."

Except for her little follower Hongling willing to follow along, Yumo's proposal was strongly opposed by other sisters. In the end, Yumo had to use the power of the prostitute leader to "wake up" them:

"Well, there is a kind of you just hide here to the end, occupy people's territory, eat people's rations, and watched as I dragged those little girls away to harm! Who are you hiding for? Do you keep someone who loves someone? ?"

She is now like a pungent village woman. She spoke a word and was scolded several times, but she was not sure who she was scolding."Hide it, hide it until you reincarnate, cast a good fetus, and be a female student too, let your fate give you a good day!"

This drink really worked, and the prostitutes quickly "recognized their lives and quietly fell silent."

Accept fate!

Still life is as cheap as grass.

But it's completely different from the impassion before.

They didn't feel that their lives were as cheap as grass, so they were generous and stalwart.

But just because you feel that your life is as low as grass, no one cares. Anyway, it is already an unclean body. It is not given to anyone or who makes your life low. Living in this world is suffering.

One is to die with a sense of mission, with the idea of ​​saving people.

One is that living and suffering anyway, living is not as good as death, and it is not that the grief of death is greater than the death of heart.

Such assumptions are of course more than one in Lao Mouzi's movies.

At this point, Yan Gelingzhong was already unrealistic enough, but Lao Mouzi was even more exaggerated than Yan Geling.

Yan Geling deliberately portrays the prostitutes' yearning for the identity of "girl student".

Twenty minutes later, the kitchen door opened, and a group of young girls in black sailor skirts and black top hats came out. They lowered their faces, holding their breasts like virgins who hated their development, under each elbow, Holds a songbook of "Bible".They are the most beautiful group of "girl students" in Nanjing."

This is what I imagined, because the female students are a dream for them, and they pretend to be female students according to their dreams, so the beautification of the dream is added.” Yan Geling once described as such.

But in fact, at the critical moment of being abused and harmed, who cares about the daughter's body that he once had?It was just a distant and miserable childhood dream.

However, in Lao Mouzi's film, the "student dream" is once again exaggerated.

You can put yourself in your place and think about it: If you knew that after dawn, you would embark on a dark and cruel road to hell, what would be in your mind tonight?Is it possible to finally be a "girl student" and look forward to it?Or is it fearful and uneasy for the imminent abuse and cruelty?

Obviously, in Lao Mouzi's mind, the prostitutes' expectations of being students far outweigh their fear of abuse and cruelty: freshly cut hair, solemn new clothes, brilliant smiles, and another long and graceful song "Qin Huai Jing" , The wide-angle lens pulls out twelve gorgeous and colorful, swaying, graceful and beautiful women.

Yes, they are so beautiful and gorgeous, as if the dark dawn will never come, they will always be the most beautiful women on the Qinhuai River. The bloody mutilation and sacrifice they suffered has been ignored by the audience and quietly forgotten by history. Years later, it was picked out from the dust of history and became a consumer product.

Qiao Feng couldn't believe that such a movie can really hurt the scars of the Chinese people's souls.

Why Schindler’s list is classic and why it’s great, because the story it tells is objective, and the director who filmed it is objective.

After reading it, people will think that such a story has actually happened in history. Even if some of the things in it did not happen when Schindler rescued the Jews, it would inevitably happen in a certain corner of that background. A moment.

Artistic processing is naturally indispensable, but if it is only the director's own take for granted, it is really difficult to convince the audience to believe the take for granted expressed in the film.

But it happens that both Lao Mouzi and Lu Chuan like this.

In this regard, Luchuang is more excessive than Lao Mouzi.

He unexpectedly showed his neutrality and objectivity in a fictitious, self-made little devil character.

In a story about the Jinling Massacre and about the Chinese people in purgatory on earth, the first protagonist who runs through, the most inked, and the most three-dimensional, turned out to be a member of the invaders.

And not to talk about the animality of the little devil, but to show his kindness, his humanity, his reflection on war and slaughter.

how?

You slap a good Virgin.

Do you want to tell all the Chinese that not all the little devils who committed the Jinling Massacre are bad guys?

You think there are good people among them.

So we can't kill with a stick. We are scolding the little devil. When we remember this matter, we must treat it dialectically. Should we distinguish that there are good people among them?

This is not neutral.

This is a crooked hip.

If there is such a person, who is adapted from real characters, don't say anything, that person is a really good person.

Just like Schindler’s list, what Schindler did and the people he saved, basically what he said in the movie happened in that time period.

Even Schindler’s list of films was made by the Jews in memory of Schindler and thanks to Schindler.

But what about the brilliance of humanity in the movie, what about the good devil Kadokawa?

Without this person, there is no similar person or thing.

Edited, Quante is my own mother who thought about people well and compiled it to show that he is not sitting on the bottom, and he is neutral.

But precisely, this so-called neutrality is the crooked hip.

Qiao Feng doesn't want this to happen in a movie he leads.

In this matter, he believes in bystanders clear.