Is Judou a good movie?

It must be.

He was nominated for the Palme d’Or in Cannes and won the Luis Bunuel Special Award, as well as the Golden Spike Award for Best Picture at the Valladolid International Film Festival and the Audience’s Best Picture Award.

Both the audience and the judges gave Judou a high praise.

Of course, there is also an Oscar nomination for best foreign language film.

But, so what?

Can a good movie win a prize?

If this is the case, Save Private Ryan will not be defeated by Shakespeare in Love and lose the Oscar for Best Picture.

Shakespeare’s love history will not create the most beautiful actress Gwyneth Paltrow in Oscar history.

Saving Private Ryan is considered to be one of the most realistic war films ever. Many veterans of World War II gave the film extremely high ratings, calling it "the most true reflection of World War II."

In particular, the 26-minute reappearance of the spectacular scene of the Normandy landing in the film is regarded as a treasure by movie fans, military fans and enthusiasts, and no one can match it.

But for such a classic movie, after getting the best director, best photography, and best editing, the best film was lost.

You should know that by convention, the best director, the best editing, the best photography, the best film is basically stable.

However, Saving Private Ryan also lost the best film that was guaranteed

Of course, if it is other competing films that won the best film, nothing needs to be said, but it happened that Rescue Private Ryan lost to Shakespeare in Love.

A classic movie full of heart-stirring reflections on the cruelty of war, and the excavation of the inner humanity of ordinary soldiers, was lost to a fictional movie about Shakespeare's love for a prospective wife.

It's ridiculous.

What can be ridiculous?

The producer of Shawin’s Love History is Miramax Films, whose boss is Harvey Weinstein.

Although Harvey was brought down by Mi Rabbit.

But this man is really good at Oscar Raiders.

And Shakespeare’s love history can be regarded as his real masterpiece of Oscars.

Think about it, how can you kill Spielberg, who is also Jewish and one of Hollywood's greatest directors, is not awesome.

Some people say that saving Private Ryan lost the best picture because this movie is not the best movie made by Spielberg, and it is not comparable to Schindler's list, so the best picture is given to Shakespeare in Love.

This argument is pure nonsense.

This is similar to the selection of three good students. There is a result of the year-round first test, but this time the first score is not as high as the last time, or even the last time. So the three good students were dropped and the last one But took the three good students.

Why?

Isn't the annual awards the strength of the same film?

How can you compare with yourself?

Even if Saving Private Ryan is not as good as Schindler's list, it can't give the best film to Shawan's love history, which is far less than Saving Private Ryan.

Really, there are too many nonsense of various awards, and there are too many factors that can affect the attribution of awards.

In Qiao Feng’s view, saving private Ryan lost to Shawin’s love history, in addition to Spielberg’s Oscar strategy is not as good as the fat Harvey, another important factor is that the original DreamWorks was being siege by the Seven Hollywood. , No one wants to see the rise of DreamWorks.

To put it bluntly, Dabing was targeted.

This is the same as Lao Mouzi's one.

Lao Mouzi's relationship with Cannes began with Judou.

Then, by staying alive four years later in Yuan Shikong, Lao Mouzi won the "Jury Prize" second only to Palme d'Or, and the starring Uncle Ge became the first Chinese Cannes actor.

A year later, "Shake and Shake to Grandma Bridge" won the "Best Technology Award" at the Cannes Film Festival.

Then the honeymoon period is over.

In 1999, Lao Mouzi participated in Cannes with "Nothing Less", but none of them was hyped by the media.

In particular, some domestic celebrities and media deliberately targeted Lao Mouzi, saying that my father and mother were false, and that none of them should be publicized. I and I should sing hymns, leading the chairman of the jury, Jill Jacobs, to think it should The film has "political implications" and I hope that Lao Mouzi can use "My Father and Mother" instead of "No One Less" to participate in the review.

As a result, Lao Mouzi issued an open letter indicting Cannes, withdrew from Cannes with two films, and broke with Cannes.

This is not the first time that Lao Mouzi encountered political reasons in Cannes.

Qiao Feng heard from Gong Li that when Judou participated in Cannes last year, Judou attracted a lot of attention at the beginning. Later, someone from the organizing committee called Lao Mouzi and said at the press conference that only Say a few words of "political correctness" and you will definitely get a big prize.

What is political correctness?

In Europe and America, it is political correctness for our people to criticize the government.

But Lao Mouzi didn't bother to win the prize in such a disgusting way, so he refused.

Then the result was that the much-watched Judou did not win an important award.

Although none of them was met with political coldness and hostility in Cannes, Lao Mouzi retired.

But the ending is still wonderful. After retiring from Cannes and going to the Venice Film Festival, I won Lao Mouzi’s second Golden Lion Award. My father and mother went to the Berlin Film Festival and won. Silver Bear Award.

Said that one cannot be less propaganda about politics. Are the judges of the Venice Film Festival blind?

As Lao Mouzi said in his open letter to Cannes and Jacobs, "My two films are all about the theme of love. "None can be less" expresses our love for children and the overall culture of our nation. The quality of the current situation and the worry about the future. "My Father and Mother" sings the truth and purity of love. This is the emotion that humans have and praise. However, what is puzzling is that you have used the reason of "politics" Accusations, this cannot but be said to be a political or cultural prejudice."

There are really too many factors affecting movie awards.

Whether a classic movie can win a prize or not, in the three major European film festivals, a judge, especially the chairman of the jury, can affect the results.

In the Oscars in the United States, it is nothing more than turning one or a few people into a large group of people.

For the Oscars who allow public relations, for many judges who basically don’t watch the participating films, giving gifts, sending their own participating films one by one to the judges to watch, and calling the trouble to promote their own movies, it is very likely to influence the judges Vote.

The reason why Harvey is invincible at the Oscars is just to play this kind of public relations to the extreme.

The only factor that may not be affected by public relations on a large scale is the international and domestic environment and political correctness.

In the face of absolute political correctness, public relations become shit.

In addition to film quality, political correctness is the biggest obstacle to Chinese film awards.

Domestic directors want to win at the Oscars. Unless they are shooting foreign themes, especially English films, it is definitely not enough if the domestic themes are just like Judou.

You have to take a slander, it is easier to win prizes if you don’t keep them all.

But what's the point of winning a prize like that.

txt download address:

phone-reading: