Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

Massachusetts, USA.

An aircraft landed at Boston International Airport.

Frank Wilzek, who had just returned to Boston from CERN headquarters in Switzerland, boarded a student's car.

When the car was on its way, the old professor, sitting in the co-driver's seat, left his laptop on the push and connected to the Wi-Fi. He received an email from across the Pacific just as he was preparing to process his work emails in his spare time.

When he saw the sender's name, his eyebrows picked it with interest and clicked on the email to look.

Doctoral students driving in the driver's seat swept the email on the screen and asked casually.

“Professor, what's going on with CERN? ”

Frank whispered as he looked at the mail.

“At present, the situation is quite optimistic, and when confidence reaches 3sigma it can be recognized as a sign that CERN staff are checking instruments, clearing tracks, holding press conferences and allowing time for water papers for their peers. When the experiment restarts in early October, this month we're going to finish the theoretical part, starting next month I'm going to let you live in Geneva a lot... hmm? ”

When the professor suddenly stopped talking, the doctor asked, “What's wrong? ”

“Nothing...” At the end of the day, Frank frowned slightly and shook his head with a smile. “It was an interesting point, but I didn't dare agree. ”

In the mail, the young man from China wrote.

[Dear Professor Frank, I have some questions about your theory of supersymmetry supplementation. According to the Delrine tensor theorem, it can be understood that the scope of meeting certain conditions must be a table demonstration category of supersymmetric group G, so we can say that supersymmetry is a more natural field theory promotion, but in the supplementary theory you put forward, it is assumed that there is an extra dimension beyond the scope of the symmetric field representation to explain why this supersymmetric particle mass is too large, is this contrary to the Delrine tensor theorem?

Academic exchanges are not about seniority ranking, there is nothing polite about it, what it is, so the Ark does not euphemize when it points out the problems it finds.

I am confident that Mr. Frank will be able to offer him a joint study invitation, regardless of his age, and will not compare to such minor matters.

However, the old man's reply was equally unsolicited...

Far across the Pacific Ocean from the Golden Ring, the Ark edited the phrase and processed data in an e-mail to Frank Wilzek's mailbox, stretching a lazy waist against the chair.

Just as he was about to get up for dinner, suddenly an unread email appeared in his mailbox.

The ark clicked on the mail and looked at the time in the lower right corner of the desktop, suddenly surprised me.

Grasshopper, is this old man up so early?

It's only 5: 00 in the morning, isn't it?

At this moment, he does not know that Mr. Frank's old man has returned to MIT, nor that he has just disembarked from the plane. Otherwise, he would be even more surprised by the old man's passion for his work.

The reply in the email was simple, mainly answering his questions.

[LU: Attachment received. Also, regarding your question, I admire the bottom line of your mathematical physics, but my suggestion is that you'd better go over the quantum mechanics statement about Wigner's theorem, and you'll understand that there's nothing wrong with my assumptions about the supersymmetric supplementary theory.

As a theoretical physics researcher, the Wigner Theoretical Ark certainly doesn't know, which is the cornerstone of the mathematical expression of quantum mechanics.

This theorem describes the principle of symmetry in physics systems, such as rotation, translation, or CPT, how these operations change the state on Hilbert's space.

According to this theory, the basic particles can essentially be represented by the non-approximate amount of the plum, and the tensor product can be made of these representations. And this operation corresponds to the physical particle restraint.

Isn't that amazing?

Mathematics and physics, united by a theorem, combine organically.

It is precisely this nature that provides the theoretical cornerstone for the later application of the Theorem of the Delrine Tensile Scope in physics.

The Ark was well aware of what Professor Frank meant, and his hypothesis of the supersymmetrical supplementary theory was consistent with the framework laid down by the Wigner Theorem, and there were no major problems, just a lack of mathematical aesthetics.

For example, as argued by the Ark, the rationality of this additional dimension cannot be explained by the Delinean tensile category theorem, although the possibility of its existence cannot be completely denied.

The ark thought about it, put your hands on the keyboard and type in your thoughts.

[But don't you think we can explain the peaks of features that exist in the 750GeV energy zone with a more mathematically aesthetic model? There is absolutely no need for us to introduce an additional dimension outside of a symmetrical field to explain his source of mass, forcing it to be a supersymmetrical particle… I mean, could it be a dark matter particle that we don't know about?

Although he had originally proposed the signal for the 750GeV energy zone to convince the old man, possibly from supersymmetrical particles, he wasn't so obsessed with the supersymmetrical particles.

Behind that characteristic peak can be a lot of things, and the universe itself is not built by yet another single set of theories.

And dark matter particles are what the ark thinks is most likely.

After all, this signal is weak enough, and if not for the massive collision accumulation, this clue might not be discoverable. Dark matter, on the other hand, is difficult to observe precisely because it barely interacts with other basic particles, including photons.

When the reply button is pressed, the ark is not in a hurry to eat, but waits quietly on the chair.

If the old man is responding to an e-mail right now, he won't have to wait too long to see the reply.

Sure enough, not long after, an email jumped out.

[You said this possibility exists, but I don't think it's very likely. I can be sure that the CERN's equipment is not advanced enough to stabilize the observation of dark matter, and if the signals observed on the ATLAS and CMS detectors are dark matter, I'm sure the characteristic peaks of the two will not be so consistent. If you have any questions about this, you can consult Mr. Lynn Evans. And with regard to my theory, I can add.

Ark closed his eyes and saw the email from scratch. He had not figured out how to refute it. Two more unread emails were thrown into his mailbox.

[If there is a firming extra dimension, each field in the high-dimensional space corresponds to a normal field of zero membranes in the four-dimensional space, plus infinite numbers of fields of mass inversely proportional to the firming length. And the source of this field, just as the original zero membrane field in the tightening dimension of the Fourier level number!

[Supersymmetric particles should also exist in this field, and it is by virtue of this relationship that the coupling of supersymmetric particles to Fermi particles should be raised instead of being depressed by the Planck energy scale. I think that makes sense in theory. So according to this theory, we should be able to find supersymmetrical particles under the TeV label, so you can have a little more confidence in LHC.

Grass grip, this typing is a little fast.

However, this first email hacked a CERN device, and the last one gave him a little confidence in the CERN collider...

What the hell is going on?

I stared at the three emails for a while, and my hands on the keyboard didn't move a bit.

The old man was so confident in his theory, and the argument was well founded.

At one point, he was silent and didn't know what to return.