Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

The sky outside the window is bright.

Lie on the canoe on your desk and slowly open your eyes.

He rubbed some sour eyebrows and looked at the calendar in the corner of the table.

It's May...

Some of the canoes shook their heads with headaches.

Since his arrival in Princeton in February, he has spent almost half of his time in this ten-square-meter house and has barely been out except driving to the supermarket to buy food.

What bothered him the most was the $5,000 club card, which he hadn't even used a few times.

Since receiving that assignment, he has been challenging Gothenbach's assumptions for nearly six months.

Now, all of this has finally come to an end.

Taking a deep breath, the ark stood up from the chair.

He got to the last step, not so anxious.

Humming into the kitchen, he brought himself something to eat, and the ark even took a bottle of champagne out of the fridge and opened the lid and poured it on himself.

Champagne was bought two months ago for this moment.

After a quiet meal, the ark washed its hands in the kitchen and went back to the desk to finish its work for a while.

After nearly fifty pages of paper, he went to sleep before finishing yesterday and continued to write with a pen.

[… it appears that we have Px (1, 1) ≥ P (x, x ^ {116}) - (12) × Px (x, p, x) -Q2-x ^ (log4) … (30)]

[… by formula (30), deduction 8, deduction 9, deduction 10, can prove that theorem 1 is valid.

The so-called Theorem 1 is the mathematical expression of Gothenbach's assumptions that he defined in his thesis.

That is, given a sufficiently large even number N, there are primes P1 and P2, satisfying N = P1 + P2.

Similar are Chen's theorem N = P1 + P2 · P3, and a series of theorems about P (a, b).

Of course, while this formula is now called Theorem 1 in his thesis, it may not be long before the mathematical community generally accepts his proof process, and this theorem may escalate into something like "terrestrial theorem”.

However, this significant mathematical conjecture typically has a longer review cycle.

Perelman proved that Pongale's thesis took three years to be recognized by the mathematical community. Looking forward to Moon's new proof of ABC's speculation because it doped a large number of “mysterious terms”, the threshold for review had to at least read his "theory of cosmic discipline” before it was an introduction, so until now no one had finished reading it, and it was difficult to predict the future.

The speed at which a major conjecture is reviewed depends to a large extent on the popularity of the proposition and the extent to which it is “new”.

In proving the twin count theorem, the Ark did not apply a particularly novel theory, but only innovated the topological methods mentioned in Professor Zelberg's paper published in '95, and those who had studied the paper could quickly learn what he had done.

Instead, the review cycle of the paper that proves the Polynyak-Lu theory clearly stretches a long cut.

Even though his cohort method is already reflected in the proof of the twin numeracy theorem, its magic ingredients diverge it far from the scope of the screening method, and even if the reviewer is a bull like Deligne, it takes a lot of time to reach a final conclusion.

And this paper on Gothenbach's Proof of Thoughts, the Ark wrote fifty pages in total, and it took at least half the length to describe the theoretical framework he had built for the entire Proof.

This part of the work could even be published as a separate paper.

Much of his review cycle depends on the interest of others in the theoretical framework he presents and the degree of acceptance of the theoretical framework he presents.

As to how long it would take, it was beyond his control.

In fact, the Ark had been thinking about what the system's judgment criteria for the completion of the task were.

If he proves a theorem, but no one recognizes his work for 10 or even decades, does that mean his task has to be stuck for so long?

And the most incomprehensible thing is that, given the huge amount of data stored in the system's database, it must come from a higher civilization - at least that civilization is more developed than the one on Earth.

Without discussing its raison d 'être, the Ark felt that systems from higher civilizations should not and would not take into account “indigenous” opinions to determine whether a problem had been solved.

With this analysis, the Ark concludes that the completion of the system task should be judged by two factors.

One is correctness.

The other one is public!

In fact, there is a simple way to verify whether or not his testimony is correct.

If it's just for the sake of publicity, it doesn't have to be in a journal...

……

After completing the paper that proved Goldbach's speculation, the Ark spent the entire three days organizing what was on paper into a computer, converting it into a PDF file, then logging onto Arxiv's website and uploading the paper.

Correct, he was more than 90% sure, because he was accustomed to rigorously calculating every conclusion and repeatedly refining everything that could go wrong.

As for disclosure.

Arxiv without peer review is definitely the fastest choice!

The only downside might be conflicts with some journals, conference posting principles, such as uploading papers before deadlines that might violate the double-blind rule, etc., but the Ark was not really concerned about those things anymore, and he believed that those that received them would not care about the end of the line.

After all, the contributor is no longer a nobody, but the winner of the Cole Prize in Numerology. Nor is the reported academic achievement unheard of, but the Goldbach conjecture in the eighth question asked by Hilbert 23, after one of the crowns of the analytical numerical theory of the Millennium Difficulty!

In two days, he will refresh the paper, solve the formatting problem, make it look more comfortable, and then contribute to the Mathematics Yearbook.

The paper that proved Wiles' proof of Fermat's theorem was heard by six reviewers at the same time, and Ark didn't know that his paper would be judged by several bosses, but it shouldn't be less than four, should it?

After watching the uploaded prompt pop-up window pop up on the web page, the ark took a long breath.

So, what if it's done?

After the paper is published, anyone or research unit interested in this area receives an alert (similar to a reminder). Not surprisingly, somewhere on Earth, someone should already be reading his article.

It is not known whether the system has a value for the reading of the paper, if so, it will take a few days to verify his guess.

Sitting in front of the computer, waiting for a cup of coffee, the ark closed its eyes, took a deep breath and softly meditated.

“System.”

When he opened his eyes again, his eyes were pure white.

It's been a while since I got back here, so much so that this time I came in here, the ark felt a little uncomfortable.

Next to the translucent holographic screen, he reached out and pressed his hand against the taskbar in a slight mood.

Soon he will be able to verify his guess...

At the same time, it is also possible to know whether one's thinking is correct.

Wait...

At this point, the ship suddenly realized the problem.

If the system does not respond to itself, does it state that it is incorrectly analyzing the conditions for completing the task, or does it indicate that there is a problem with its thesis text?

However, the system did not give him time to think about the issue.

Tip sounds like a sky.

Immediately thereafter, a line of text appeared in his curtain.

Congratulations host, complete the task!