Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

2: 00 sharp.

An ark in a suit of leather shoes walked onto the podium and a noisy debriefing hall, originally due to the crossover, calmed down.

No one maintains discipline, everyone is implicit, with a pair of eyes on the person on the podium, or suspicious, or expecting, or faceless.

If it's someone else, let's not talk about math. I'm afraid my legs are soft.

But the ark that stood on the podium looked generous and was not frightened at all by the pressure of those two sights.

Prepare yourselves when you're down the stage.

Besides, it's not the first time he's faced such an occasion.

“Thank you all for coming to Princeton from around the world and for listening to me stand here and report on the results of my research on Gothenbach speculation. ”

As is customary, thanks go to the scholars who were invited to the debriefing, and the Ark began the process of presenting itself to the debriefing.

“The content of my statement will be divided into two parts, one on the cluster approach I used in proving my Gothenbach conjecture and the other on proof of my Gothenbach conjecture. ”

“I'm sure you've all read my paper before coming here. I will simplify the lengthy and cumbersome steps in the paper in PPT. Regarding my presentation, I will focus mainly on key steps as well as thoughts and ideas. ”

“In addition, I will spend as much time as possible in the questioning session. ”

It is both a practice and a necessary courtesy to preview the presenter's thesis before the beginning of the colloquium. If you get to the questioning session, all the questions you get up and ask are written on the paper, or irrelevant, it will be considered rude and level free.

For all the bulls in this room, such problems will naturally not arise.

Likewise, those parts of the paper that have been clearly written do not need to be repeated on PPT. After all, everyone's time is precious, and they didn't come all the way to Princeton to watch the slides.

At the end of the opening remarks, the ark went straight to the point.

“The so-called cluster approach is the abbreviation ‘holistic structural research method of cluster theory', the core idea of which is to use the concept of circular groups to study infinity from a holistic perspective. Based on the theorem that integer mode p multiplication groups are always cyclic groups, we can get..."

Explain that the ark's laser pen is swimming on a white screen.

[… has a finite group G and | G | = p1α1p2α2 · · · piαi, where pi is prime number and αi is positive integer. Make p π (G), define deg (p) = | {q π (G) | p ~ q) |

The number of times deg (p) is called vertex p. Redefine C (G) = …]

The theory of cluster approach is even more critical than the second half of the evidence of Gothenbach's assumptions, because only those sitting in the reporting room listening to him understand what exactly he is doing.

So the content of this part, the ark, is extraordinarily detailed and makes every point as clear as possible.

And the people sitting under the stage, whether they're invited scholars or students who don't come, listen very carefully.

James Maynard, in particular, sat in the middle of the room with his arms in his arms and listened with great care.

The so-called colleague is the wrongdoer, and he's also studying prime numbers, and he's a great analyst in the field of mathematics in the new generation of British mathematicians. And as one of the top candidates for the Philip Prize, he was going to overweight himself with the 18-year Fields Prize with the twin count question, but he didn't want to end up on the ark first, angrily he set the manuscript on fire.

It can be said that he came all the way here from England to pick out his competitors' problems.

But here's the thing...

The more he looked down, the more intriguing his expression was.

The logic of this Chinese scholar is so rigorous that now not only has he not found any problems, he can't even bear to call it well...

Next to him was his Ph.D. student, also an Englishman named Evan.

Looking at the lines of text flashing on the screen, the English lad gradually started to lose pace.

Finally, he couldn't bear to whisper.

“Professor, what the hell is he talking about? ”

Menard watched the screening PPT meticulously, silently.

He could answer that question, but he couldn't.

First, he didn't want to miss any details because of distraction, and second, he was afraid to say his praise for this ingenious method in words… And just the day before yesterday, he also threatened on his personal blog that these 50 pages of papers were scrap paper and would unravel the Chinese trick on the spot at Princeton's presentation.

But even if he doesn't want to admit it, he has to admit that there may be more than one Faye prize between him and his opponent...

Yes or no, mathematics is such a reality.

On the other hand, behind the reporting hall, the two elderly people sat in the corner of the hall, looking at the briefing, whispering in a chatty tone.

“Didn't expect me to leave just a few years ago, and the Princeton Institute of Higher Studies came up with another talent.” Looking at the young man on stage, Andrew Wiles nodded in praise of the place, "Well, it was half my scenery. ”

Andrew Wiles rarely returned to Princeton Institute of Higher Studies after returning to his alma mater, Oxford University, to teach in 2011. And the position of director of the mathematics department at Princeton University was given to another genius, Charles Feverman.

And that was the most important mathematics lecture at the end of the 20th century, 23 years ago, at the Newton Institute. More than 200 mathematicians listened to the speech, although only a quarter of them were able to fully understand the Greek letters and formulas on the blackboard at the time.

As for the other three quarters, not far from England, only to witness history.

It's the same now.

Though Goldbach speculated more like a test for intelligence than a broad application of Fermat's theorem, this test for intelligence could be placed by Hilbert in Question 8 of Question 23, where his position in mathematics and even in mathematics as a whole could be seen.

Solving it may not change the world like the Millennium Problem or the mathematics like the Fermata Theorem, but the tools created in solving this problem are invaluable to the entire mathematical community.

There is no doubt that everyone sitting here is witnessing history.

“Oh,” Deligne said with a smile, relentless shorthand, "I don't know who it was, an end-of-the-world look all day, intending to apologize to The New York Times and return the open champagne. ”

Wiles coughed softly and understated this dark history: "Inspiration can only be driven when one faces despair. I just pushed myself off the road, and then I was born... and in terms of results, I did it. ”

Deligne bluntly revealed: "Didn't you explain the art of behavior last time? ”

“Well, my dear friend, let's change the subject," Wiles switched the subject silently, looking at the content on the screen, and said, "Goldbach assumes I don't really understand, from your point of view, is his thesis proof? ”

DL: “You should ask Ivanetts, and Faltines. They're the experts in numerical analysis, and I'm just hunting about prime numbers. Of course, after reading his paper, my point of view is more optimistic. ”

If he was not optimistic, he would not be scheduling such a briefing for the Ark, but would suggest its modification.

Wiles looked surprised: "Is Fartings here too? ”

“Not that he's here,” said Deligne, pausing for a moment, "but nobody wants to miss...”

At this time, a whispering exclamation sounded in the hall.

That was amazing.

It also contains praise.

Deligne and Wiles stopped talking and looked up on stage.

After a while, Wiles smiled and said, "Looks like our fears are superfluous. ”

Looking at the formula on the screen, Deligne's mouth finally stretched a little joy.

“I've never been worried. ”