Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

The report will come to a close with failure.

While this world-class puzzle physics community is often tolerated enough that no one will immediately impose the death penalty on his thesis as long as he can make reasonable corrections to the problems that arise in the thesis, it remains a serious blow to him personally.

After all, in general, it is difficult for even the most distinguished scholars to report on errors in the validation process, especially for most scholars who are not primarily engaged in research in the field, if not for a paper that has been released for a long time or is clearly flawed.

Like revising papers, debating and communicating with juries at length, those troublesome things are usually done during the review of journal submissions.

Now, however, it is only part of the debriefing that ends so tragically.

While he was frustrated, he couldn't help but feel humiliated...

“Shit! ”

Dropping the paper on the floor, Professor Brian held his fist tight and ended up worried about hurting himself or not hitting the table.

Looking at Professor Brian, angry, the office was full of cicadas and no one dared to make a sound.

Although the old gentleman usually looks like a charming old gentleman, that doesn't mean he's always like this. After spending a long time with him, you'll know that his heart isn't as broad as it looks.

Especially when he's angry, if anyone inspires him, as long as he's still at Oxford, he can't have a good life.

Professor Brian finally calmed down after a while when his chest fluctuated.

The assistant standing next to him looked at his expression and seemed to be about the right time, hesitating for a moment to say comfort.

“It's not a fatal mistake, although we can't explain the problem, at least we calculated the mass m of that particle with this spatiotemporal field, and the computer simulation results basically match… Perhaps our demonstration process is flawed, but at least nobody can prove us wrong. ”

Professor Brian's expression softened slightly when he heard it, but he still couldn't talk about how friendly it was.

“It doesn't make sense… computer simulation results are not always convincing, especially on this issue," Professor Brian thought headachedly for a long time with his forefinger and thumb pressed against his eyebrow, eventually saying, "But you're right, at least nobody can prove us wrong, it's just not perfect. ”

As his eyebrows widened, Professor Brian took a deep breath, raised his head and relaxed, clearing his voice and saying.

“Well, boys, get ready for work... the professor from Asia is right, this loophole is critical. Failure to prove that the grid step reached the zero time limit would be fatally flawed for our proof, and it would not be a good thing to find this gap untested earlier. ”

Having heard Professor Bryan say this, everyone was relieved and the office was back busy.

Before starting work, Professor Brian got up and walked over to the coffee machine by the cupboard and made himself a cup of coffee.

Go back to your desk and sit down, before you begin to solve this problem, he intends to set a modified status for the paper hanging on Arxiv.

However, when he landed on the Arxiv website, he discovered that the tags he tracked had been hung out with new papers, and that Heran was the quality gap in the Yang Mills equation, a proposition he had claimed to prove.

Professor Bryan thought in his heart who had such an iron head that he lit up the paper.

However, the mouse didn't matter at all, and the moment he saw the title of the paper and the author, he was suddenly surprised.

Lu.Zhou?!

WTF?!

Before hesitating, he quickly swept through the abstracts of the paper and immediately jumped to the body.

The further down he looked, however, the more restrained his eyelids became.

Especially when he sees the middle part and sees the "m = √ (2 + O (λ ^ 3))" line of key formulas, jumping scared in his eyes and instantly turning into angry fire.

Prove it's the same way as him?

The pre-printed version posted by the Ark is also quoted from the paper published by Jaffey in the Academic Yearbook, as well as Mass m on how λ unfolds gradually!

At best, there was a slight “slight” deviation in the thought of solving the problem… at least in his view it was quite minor.

He used, for example, a scale field on a temporal and spatial current, sort of a continuation of the method used by Weinberg in establishing a unified theory of weak electricity, whereas the ark used the establishment of a quantum field corresponding to the classic amount of action in the aforementioned question, the quantum Young Mills field.

A burst of thunder sounded in the office, and Professor Brian stood angrily from the chair.

“This can't be a coincidence! ”

He understands everything.

Why didn't the ship show up at the scene?

Why was a “nobody named” from Jinling University on the scene?

Why does this “nobody" in turn poke weaknesses in his thesis?

Turns out everything was paved, everything was just to ruin his debriefing, and then, as he modified his thesis, he improved his proof line and eventually grabbed the result before him.

This is not uncommon in academia, at least not in physics. When an idea is released without being well applied, it is quickly processed into its own by peers in order to seize “first” or “simultaneous" reputation.

And yet he never thought that famous scholars like the Ark would do that!

“Professor...”

Looking at the professor who stood up, the assistant sitting at the desk next to him just said a few words, but swallowed back.

Seeing that twisted face was filled with anger.

When a person's eyes have been obscured by the flame of hatred, it is useless to say anything.

Staring dead at the paper on the screen with his bloody eyes, Professor Brian bites his teeth and says, “Contact the BBC reporter for me, I have to let everyone know what a shameless trick this reckless guy has done in the back! ”

……

University of Oxford campus.

With the departure of scholars from all over the world, the academic atmosphere on campus has returned to the tranquillity of the past.

On the tarmac road in front of a nearby café, two doctors of theoretical physics with books clamped under their elbows walked side by side. Judging from the conversation between the two, they had probably just come out of the library and were ready to return to their dormitories.

The topic quickly shifted from quantum chromodynamics to the latest research in the normative field.

“Did you hear that? Strong interaction quality gap problem solved! ”

“You mean Professor Brian Carlo's certificate? Isn't that proven wrong? ”

“Not him. I'm talking about Professor Lu's thesis. ”

“Lu, the Lu from Jinling University? ”

“Don't you know? Last night he hung his preprint on Arxiv, and at 3: 00 a.m. my professor also tweeted an 'unbelievable’, and I got up this morning and went to like it. ”

“On Arxiv?! Thank you. I just remembered I left something in the library. I'm going first! ”

“ …… ”

Under a big umbrella outside the cafe.

Witten smiled in her sunglasses as she watched the young man hurrying by the road.

“It seems that Professor Lu was quite the first. ”

Instead of rushing back to CERN for two days, he shared with Dean Goddard that new idea of "solving quality gaps from a string theory perspective", but now it seems that these two days of discussion are somewhat unnecessary.

After all, Professor Lu, who has always been well known for his rigour, released a pre-printed copy.

It would be harder than writing one yourself to pick out a problem from his thesis, especially in the field of mathematics.

Sitting across from Witten, Goddard had a sip of coffee and seemed to expect the same.

“Expected. ”

“The day after tomorrow CERN had another meeting," looking at the watch, Witten looked up to Dean Goddard, "so now that the quality gap has been resolved, is it necessary for us to continue our discussion? ”

Goddard: "Although the problem of quality gaps has been solved, the problem of strong interplay and electromagnetic interaction has not yet been solved. Are you not interested in the Nobel Prize? ”

He was well aware of Witten's weaknesses and had clearly begun the age of string theory without winning the Nobel Prize, something that he had always had in mind.

At present, it is impossible to win the Nobel Prize through the M theory, which, after all, has little hope of being tested for at least a century. However, there is not only string theory to be pursued in the theoretical physics community, but there is also only one path to the theory of general unity.

However…

“Don't waste your time,” Vito laughed and stood up from his seat, "If he's right, no one in the world is closer to the truth than he is. Want to walk in front of him, except to have a gift far superior to his, and sweat. If I were 20 years younger... or 30 years younger, I'd be interested in competing with him, but now..."

Suddenly, Witten shrugged at Goddard and continued.

“Don't say it's me. Do you have that confidence? ”

Goddard did not speak, just stretched out his index finger, gently touched the coffee cup and sipped silently.

Aging is a sad topic.

Especially for academics like life.

While I don't mind adding a few more ditches to my face, mental retardation and energy decline are irreversible. Neither he nor his old friend Witten are old enough to discuss the age of days and nights for an academic issue.

Their time has passed...