Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

What the hell is that?

Surprised not only by Luo Wenxuan but also by the students of the Ark, but also by the Ark itself, I can't believe the content of this email.

After a thorough reading of Professor Fartings' review comments, the Ark generally understood what he meant.

According to Professor Faltins, he argues that the disputed position of some parts of the thesis leads to a serious proving defect in the core of the entire thesis, which is not sufficient to demonstrate the absence of a non-zero ordinary point of zeta function in the region of Re (s) ≥ 1-ε when the value of ε is taken indefinitely for an hour.

To be honest, the Ark wrote this paper, and it was the first time it was called back for rectification.

Standing behind the ark, he also saw the review from the beginning, and Rowen swallowed his mouth and spit.

“Prove a problem? ”

The ark shook its head: “It's too early to make a decision until I see it. ”

Hearing this, He Changwen, sitting beside him with his ears upright, almost didn't turn the pen in his hand to fly out.

Yes, I can.

Others received a letter suggesting rectification. The first reaction was to change things honestly and honestly. When did you change to when the reviewer was comfortable? The old man also needs to look at it and say...

Thinking about it, He Changwen's heart is also full of emotion.

The boss is the boss...

Since when does he have to be so awesome...

Didn't notice what several of his students were thinking.

After that sentence, the ark bent down and flipped out of the basement cabinet under the desk the printed copy of the paper that had previously proved Lehman's assumptions, checking it against the position noted by Professor Faltines.

Because he couldn't understand anything as deep as numeracy, Rowenxuan stood behind the ark, pretending to understand, quietly waiting for the results of the landing.

So, it's been about 10 minutes.

Just as Luo Wenxuan and others were about to start beating, the ark suddenly snapped and closed the paper in hand, leaving the stack of paper on the table.

After watching the ark, Luo Wenxuan asked curiously.

“How did it go? ”

The ark shook its head.

“I don't think there's a problem with my writing. ”

Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked: "So... is Professor Faltines mistaken? ”

When he said that, he had no heart.

That was Professor Fartings, the first person in mathematics after Grotendic.

I'm afraid it's a little more influential in mathematics than my mentor Edward Witten.

However, the old gentleman is also famous for his bizarre temper, and his academics are not as good as Weitang.

“It is too early to discuss who is right and who is wrong," stood up from the chair and paused for a moment, the ark continued, “I will communicate with Professor Fartings on this issue. ”

“I'm afraid it's a little difficult to communicate with Professor Martins… what he admits is basically unchanged, and…” hesitated, Rowenxuan said, "… if you can't convince him, I'm afraid he'll keep ridiculing you. ”

“These are secondary,” the ark said less carelessly, "and if he's right, I'll just fix it. If I'm right, I won't change a symbol. ”

Luo Wenxuan asked, “What if none of you can convince anyone? ”

This situation is also quite common in mathematics, when the academic level of two people is very different, and the voice in academia is very close, and it is really difficult to convince anyone on issues that are similar to, rather than different.

After all, the deeper we go into the frontier, the less obvious many things are. Sometimes there are two different perspectives on the same issue in two different schools, and it is possible that this has been argued for quite some time.

And, of course, that's where mathematics comes in.

No matter how much controversy exists, no controversy can last forever, and the right party will always stand out from the crowd. Even the three mathematical crises that had erupted in history had almost shaken the very foundations of the entire mathematics building, but in the end a suitable path had been found to resolve all the controversies.

“If no one can convince anyone...”

Paused for a moment, the ark continued without a trace.

“Then it depends on who can convince the others. ”

……

There's never a wall wall wall in the world that hasn't a crack.

Especially when there's a bunch of gossipy creatures lying on the side of this wall.

On the evening of the Ark's receipt of the written opinion of the Journal of Mathematics, a major event took place on Mathoverflow.

Someone suddenly popped up and the paper presented by the Ark in the Mathematical Yearbook on the “Assumption of Lehman" certificate was beaten back by the reviewer, Professor Fartings.

As soon as the message came out, it immediately detonated the topic of the entire forum, almost as long as the forum was opened, and one could see that the matter was being discussed enthusiastically.

[Professor Lu was rejected?! The Sun rises from the West!

[I told you, his proof was seriously flawed, and you all sprayed me. Now, look, I'm not the only one who thinks that, even Professor Fartings thinks that. Spray it? Fools!

[It's just that rejection is common, right? Even top scholars inevitably have some minor flaws in their papers.

[It's not as simple as rejecting a draft. Didn't you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection is not as simple as some minor flaws, but rather “significant flaws in the core case". You know what that means? Generally speaking, this means that if you can't provide a satisfactory additional explanation for this, the next time you don't call back to fix it, you just throw it in the waste basket!

[Anyway, this is unusual...]

[Nothing unusual, after all, the reviewer is Faltines. This old guy is famous for not talking, otherwise he won't be able to hang out in Princeton, run back to Germany to teach... this is too offensive, please allow me to be anonymous.

……

In fact, strictly speaking, the review process of the reviewer should be strictly confidential, but somehow, part of the screenshot of the response to the review opinion was leaked by some boring person.

The editorial department of the Mathematics Yearbook contacted the administrator of the Mathoverflow forum as soon as it became aware of the incident, and the administrator of the M forum collaboratively removed the sticker. But that's the way things are on the Internet, and once a secret is known to more than two people, it can't be called a secret.

Not to mention the lack of gossip in mathematics, so much so that little things like sesame seeds can get popular with the whole academic community.

Not to mention Faltines and the Ark, two big bulls, the focus of the debate revolved around Lehman guessing the difficulty of this kind of nuclear bomb class...

The controversy lasted a full three days and neither party responded.

One is a forum where young scholars don't go much, and the other, who has an account, probably doesn't care about explanations.

Just as we were discussing continuous fermentation, just as people were discussing the landing boat or what further action Faltines would take, Jinling University, which had been outside the whirlpool of public opinion, suddenly released a heavy message on the official website.

The message is short, but it's only a hundred words short.

And yet the amount of information is so vast that almost everyone doesn't respond.

[On December 18, our school will conduct an academic presentation on the theme "Associate Lehman Proof of Thoughts” in the old campus auditorium, and will answer questions from a wide range of scholars on the spot regarding the existence of questions in the certification process. Registration channels are now open and interested parties are invited to submit their names by the deadline of 7 December.

[Presenter: Ark (Academician)]

Almost the day this message was released...

The whole mathematics world is boiling!