View a map spread out on your desk.
More precisely, focus on the three pawns placed on the map.
Its color is black. In other words, it represents an enemy army.
On the field map, the Southern Horse Army invaded Arunya.
To deal with this, the enemy forces threefold the legions.
And each of those three armies, independently, launched a campaign battle.
I'm in the middle of destroying every southern Horse Army.
From the east, the troop strength of each of the three armies is twelve thousand, twenty thousand, eighty thousand and so on.
Is the central army thick to make it easier to send reinforcements left and right?
Hmmm...... Some, it would be depleted in the fighting with the Southern Horsemen......
Still, through the Southern Hordes, our army is inferior to the number of soldiers.
This is 20,000 for the Second Army, 10,000 for me. Together, 30,000 troops. The difference is, like, about 10,000.
Even so, the Army of Arlunia is a gathering group of the Hordes. In contrast, our army is dominated by the Regular Army, the Second Army.
In view of the smell of the soldiers, it is a battle power difference that can be fought enough......
Still, one hand is not enough to make the must-win.
You'll need to pack it up there.
Yes, there's an ops meeting going on right now to ensure a definitive victory.
Each of the participating high-ranking officers speaks his or her own view.
From next to next, there will be a hiccup of the proposed operation.
Not while there is silence in the conference room.
It's not particularly rough, but what a mess it is.
Now inside, the story is not going to get caught up.
When you think it's a hassle inside, a change appears in the meeting.
Until then, Admiral Rutherford kept his mouth shut and watched the change.
His gaze is directed straight at me.
"Your Highness the Regent, no, the Witch's Palace. Will you show us your magic again?"
As such, General Rutherford inadvertently turns his water on me.
Hmm, what's going on?
"Oh? That's a statement that doesn't sound like a responsible general as a soldier, does it? Relying on others, relying on magic."
Admiral Rutherford is tough.
"I pushed my opposition to put the Southern Horse Army ahead. If so, Your Highness must be held accountable until the end."
Pioneering...... right. Heh heh, that's a lot of well-considered dialogue.
I show my shoulders flattered.
"I see, Your Excellency's words seem to make sense. If so, open the abdominal proposal."
I point to the three black pawns on the map.
"… Immediately, the enemy forces will finish destroying each of the Southern Horse armies. After that, I think we'll join the army in three parts."
So I cut it once and peek at the officers around me.
Everyone nods small when there is no doubt about the reasoning to that point.
"We move before this rendezvous."
I, when I take a white pawn representing my own army, place it in such a position as to throw it in the front of the enemy army, in the belly of the three armies, with a cottonnaire to show it.
"Forward until this position is taken. In that case, I wonder if the enemy forces have a high budget to move their armies so as to surround our armies from the three sides instead of rendezvous."
"... affirm. but the flow would be a bad development for us"
To the words of Admiral Rutherford, I nod.
"Yes. So as soon as the enemy rides the invitation, develop a thorough manoeuvre. Destroy all three enemy armies."
I will take the white pawns again, and I will knock them down, in order from the east, to the three black pawns, with the tips, with the tips, with the tips, with the tips.
Indoors, a low groan sounded.
Operation ext.; and Operation ext.
An ext is when a unit that has become one opposes the surrounding enemy. Refers to a state where troops are connected in the rear and in a single barracks line.
An outer line is a state in which two or more groups unfold into the form of pinching enemies, while a rear line refers to a state each connected on its own line of barracks.
These two operations. Where it is intended, whether separately or not.
No, would it be more right to say back-to-back than separate?
The intent of the ext operation is nothing more than to place units concentrated in one among multiple enemies and destroy each one.
Famous as a practitioner of this operation is the French Napoleon.
In many battles, Napoleon has won this ext operation.
Rapidly advancing the regiment, their own forces concentrate their troops at the final point and beat them before the enemy forces come together in one. On the spot, create numerical advantages and destroy each enemy.
True, it was the battle between "concentration" and "manoeuvre", which can be called the textbook of these two principles, that was the pinnacle of Napoleon.
Meanwhile, the intent of Operation Outline is to divide allies into multiple units to pinch, pinch, or target enemy sieges.
The great German Mortke supported this operation.
rail and telecommunications technologies developed at the time. It was concluded that an army with extraordinary speed as a result of these could destroy its enemies before they were destroyed, even if they marched in multiple divisions.
This back-to-back, ext and ext ops.
It doesn't mean either is right. Each one makes sense.
So, in fact, what happens if these two operations get bumped on the battlefield?
If you string history together, both operations are winning or losing the opponent's operation.
What were the factors that divided that victory and defeat?
That's nothing more than manoeuvre.
With mobility, you can destroy each enemy before they siege you.
Conversely, with mobility, the siege can be eliminated before each is destroyed.
Well, my suggestion is to hire an ext op.
Aim to destroy each enemy army through a thorough manoeuvre.
If so, as mentioned, we need manoeuvre.
Self- or enemy forces, which one is better at mobility?
The answer is, of course, ours.
Or else, I wouldn't propose an operation like this.
The Second Army, the main force of its own, has a powerful cavalry that bombards its name both domestically and internationally.
Besides, my wand unit is also proud of its medium mobility.
... My wand unit has evolved greatly since nine years ago.
Yes, I did my best to increase the size of the troops.
Now, that evolution is about putting a wand soldier on your horse all the time.
It is a so-called dragon cavalry. Dragon Cavalry.
What a lovely sound.
You're going to blow my mind if I throw away the cook.
Dragon Cavalry refers to a gunman on board.
Most of all, he is a horseback riding infantry who travels on horseback, not a cavalry family.
In other words, divide the horse as a means of movement.
In the battle stage, we disembark and shoot the wand. Unfortunately.
I mean, shooting refreshingly while riding a horse, there's no such thing.
Unfortunately. Unfortunately. Sincerely, unfortunately.
Yeah, there's a little something missing around there......
Still, get high mobility. That alone can be described as evolution in twelve minutes.
... Huh? Holding five thousand private soldiers, he even holds a gold-eating bug horse.
That's all the money an individual gets? Where did that money come from?
Oh, of course, it's the result of a legitimate gold measure.
I have a talent for making money. Besides, I've been good at it.
There was no dark injustice behind it. You like that?
... Gohon, anyway, that's why our mobility is at a high standard.
What about the enemy army?
It is not possible to appreciate the gathering of each marquis in one bite...
At the very least, the Army of the Arlnian Marquis has never heard such rhetoric as superior mobility.
On top of that, he was forced to turn right and left to deal with the southern martial armies that attacked him in pieces.
The soldiers are exhausted. You can't even hope for agile movements.
If so, let's say that each destruction is highly calculated to work.
I will explain things like that to the officers around me in a rough way.
No negative opinions emerge.
Admiral Rutherford opens his mouth when he makes sure no one disagrees.
"It's a muscular operation. I guess it's also highly feasible. However, in the unlikely event that the enemy forces moved unexpectedly and did not destroy each. Shouldn't we also have insurance at that time?
Hmm, that's prudent. No, if I make one mistake, it's the battlefield that makes it catastrophic.
The toughness of knocking on a stone bridge would be something to respect.
If it didn't work...?
"Assuming the enemy moves agile, you won't be able to stop the East Army from destroying each and every one."
Yeah. I'm never optimistic.
First of all, there's no doubt that the 12,000 farthest east can be destroyed.
That much manoeuvre, we have.
The problem is then.
While we are crushing the East Army, the Central and West armies join us.
The possibility is twelve. But......
Enemy troops, central, west, combined, 28,000.
In relation to these two joining armies, given the depletion of our battle with the East Army, will the number of combatable troops be slightly lower than the two enemy armies?
There is no doubt, however, that the difference has narrowed considerably more than the current difference in military strength.
If you can fit into a few thousand or so different soldier numbers, this one is in Russia's favor, in view of his level of practice.
That step, through the enemy allies, would make that perception the same. If…….
Heh heh, eight inches ahead of the mouth. Let me adorn and raise my best victory.
Yeah, I went before I came to this fight, and prep won't be wasted.
Right. I like that.
When I finish my thoughts, I open my mouth.
"As long as we destroy the East Army, later, no problem. No matter how the war changes, our army's victory will not waver. I assure you so."
I, convinced of the truth victory, hoisted my nigga and the edge of my mouth.