Successful fruit picking system

Netizens were a little confused after seeing the UN General Assembly’s plan to split the box office.

Is the so-called box office split like this?Can it be like this?!

This is completely different from what they had imagined before, seeing how many millionaires will appear in the end,

There is no one...

Some people are surprised that Zhai Xiaoguo is willing to divide the money?I only got more than 900,000 yuan of labor remuneration, and the principal invested did not even the interest of the occupation during this period. How much did it go in?

But since this is an external announcement and is for everyone to see, in the end, it must be really divided the money!

In such a situation where the whole people are onlookers, if you really want to say one thing and do one thing, then wait for the social death of the previous group of fraudsters...

So everyone began to admire the way the United Nations General Assembly divides money, and then unconsciously complained about where they work and their unscrupulous boss, completely forgetting that they used their boss as a parent when they went to work yesterday...

Unlike the perspective of working as a worker, those who are bosses don’t think so!

Although it doesn't matter how the schools and enterprises of the United Nations University make money, it does not matter to them, this incident really shakes the rationale for them to take the surplus of others' labor!

Going further, this shakes the organization of production and distribution with capital as the core!

In contrast, it doesn’t matter whether the students of the United Nations University trash or not, okay?

As the saying goes, heretics are more hateful than infidels, and need a few more cuts...

Now Zhai Xiaoguo looks like a capitalist on the surface, because he is still using money to buy, that is, using capital to organize production.

Such as buying equipment, paying for other people’s labor, etc.,

However, when it comes to organizational distribution, the practice of distributing labor value according to capital ownership is completely discarded...

So, if it sounds nice, he is an unscrupulous capitalist.

It doesn't sound good. He is the thief who wants to turn capital into tools and capitalists into tools. Oh no, it's capital thief!

How can this make other pure and innocent capitalists bear it?!Such heretics must be killed immediately in the bud!!

However, it was not them who stood out in the first wave, but a small group of experts and scholars...

They said that this is not progress at the UN General Assembly, but a retrogression!

It’s not that Daxia has never experienced the age of eating big pot of rice and practicing egalitarianism.

If Zhai Xiaoguo does this, then people will be lazy, unwilling to work, and the organization will be inefficient, unable to make ends meet, and eventually collapse.

At that time, will we still have to return to the "right track" and die of low efficiency and replace them with more efficient ones?

Is it interesting to toss again?

In this regard, Zhai Xiaoguo is too lazy to respond...

Let's not say that it is a complicated problem with multiple variables. The other party doesn't even hold the basic logic chain!

If you want to argue the scriptures, at least you have to make sure that what you are saying is true, and then gossip?

What's said is not true, but you are still a shit...

It’s problematic to use the result to reverse the rationality of Ang directly. Just give an example to understand:

Zhang San hacked Li Si to death and took the property of Li Si's family as his own. Then Zhang San and his descendants lived a happy and surplus life, and Li Si's and Li Si's descendants lived tight pants. The poor and miserable life of the belt.

Just looking at the results, Zhang Sanjia lived well, while Li Sijia lived miserably.

So from the results, it was concluded that Zhang Sanjia is better than Li Sijia, and then everyone should follow the methodology given by Mr. Zhang San, so that everyone can become as rich as Zhang Sanjia...

This logical derivation is no more...

The efficiency of this group of people is high. The essence is to use one person to do the work of the original two people, and then give this person more than 1 times but less than 2 times the salary, so as to take more labor surplus and expand their own assets...

Even if you use a machine, the person behind the machine is still human.

Because whether a person works with a screwdriver or works with these complicated machines after inventing a complicated machine assembly line, the essence is the same, except that the machine is a more complicated tool than a screwdriver.

So the essence is to do more work with fewer people...

Since then, people will have a sense of contradiction that the productivity is clearly developing, but they don’t live more easily because of this, but the more they live, the more tired they are...

What this says is that the people involved are very tired, and that the people who are squeezed out...

People who should be squeezed out for capital densification gradually become useless population.

In ancient times, you can wait to die,

In modern times, the inhumane methods include launching wars like those powers, sending people to the battlefield to die, which is equivalent to consuming excess capacity, and people are just one of the excess products...

There are also humane methods. After all, starting a war may not necessarily make money, so it’s not that I don’t want to, but it’s not cost-effective.

In this case, the useless people can stay alive, and then live and wait for death...

Of course, there is something more humane, that is, not giving birth at all...

So, since the underlying principles are all there, why choose this path?

It is generally believed that it is impossible not to do this, because there is not only one player in the world, but a multi-player competitive game system, so a player cannot freely choose his own route...

Specifically, if you don’t do this, other people can do it, and then other people’s efficiency and productivity can be improved, and then they can use their advanced productivity to get rid of them.

Daxia has personally experienced...

So there is a problem, as long as there are other players as competitors, I can't stop and rest...

That’s why some people discovered that only by liberating all players can they finally liberate themselves...

And liberating all players can only think about it, it is impossible in reality...

Don’t forget, even when the civilization or productivity level is out of modern times, the industrial civilization has not been able to hit all the agricultural civilizations, tribal civilizations and other players in the world, and then become your own family and have the final say, and then you can freely want to go. Follow any route.

There are generation gaps that can’t be done, let alone more and more industrial players, and more and more players with mushroom killers.

Although the level of each other is high and low, there is no generation gap from the perspective of the overall civilization...

So there is no player in this world who can balance all the other players, and then change their way of life.

In the end, under the game, the players can only scroll inward, madly scrolling...

Either players roll each other, or players first hug each other, and then roll...

Let’s see who gets engulfed first, and the rest can breathe,

But it was just a breather, not a win...

As I just said, it is impossible to liberate all other players in reality. Can we win all players by rolling?

Of course not...

In short, just one sentence:

If the means of developing the productive forces contradict the purpose of developing the productive forces, which side is preferred?

In other words, is it to develop productivity to serve people, or do people serve to develop productivity?

Ideally, of course, we want the former. Developing productivity makes people live more comfortable.

However, because the players have to compete and kill each other, they eventually become a tool for humans to increase productivity. It seems that they have to use capital to increase their resources to pool the resources of most people and build more complex machines. And products, let fewer people do more...

However, Comrade Zhai Xiaoguo is not in this contradiction system!

He doesn't need to rely on rolls to develop productivity, just picks!

After picking the fruit, divide it...

Moreover, this is not a pig-raising model of spreading grain in vain, because he can't produce it himself, and he has to organize production. This requires the self-spurring of the shovelers.

So don’t look at the formal employees in schools and enterprises who never need to work overtime, but because the students are in the process of learning and absorbing the fruits of success, they are more like social animals...

To be continued...