The World of Deities

My recent situation is that after I finished the chapter at noon, I read the first round of book reviews in about half an hour, mainly looking for hand errors and typos found by readers, and correcting them as soon as possible so that readers who follow can read more smoothly.

Later, in the evening or the next day, I will read the second round of book reviews and read readers’ feedback.

I saw some feedback recently.

For example, some readers say that they do not like the interaction between male and female characters. This is normal feedback. I can see it and I will find ways to improve.

However, some readers will say "These chapters are inexplicable", or "These chapters are poisonous." I think the motivation of these readers is "I want this book to look better." First of all, thank you.

But then the problem came. I read these comments repeatedly. I really don’t know what the "inexplicable" is, or where the "poisoned spot" is. It is the character, the plot, the action, the description. Is it rhetoric, foreshadowing, or something else.

Therefore, I hope that readers can do me a favor. When expressing feedback, try to say "which specific paragraph or specific matter is problematic" so that I can understand.

For example, how do I feel about Hult’s character.

For example, I think this rhetoric is too exaggerated, what milk or cream is, awkward.

For example, I think the rolling performance of the five fire men in this episode is not good enough, it should be more exciting.

Only by saying this can I understand, otherwise I really don’t understand, even if I break my head and want to improve, I can’t do it.

The reason is simple, each of us has different ways of cognition.

I only discovered this problem recently. Everyone’s cognition is like a circle. Everyone is using their own circle to cover things. Unfortunately, everyone’s circle is like our fingerprint or iris. It looks similar, but in reality it is very different. , So it caused a lot of misunderstandings between people.

For those top people in various industries, either the circle is very large and can accommodate many differences, or there are more circles to cover different things. This is the realm I pursue.

Uh, it seems that I have said too much, anyway, I can make it clear.

So let me mention a general three-step feedback model

, For specific issues, I think the flame goblin is a poison point.

, The specific reason is because I think the flame goblin’s butt is not curled enough (squinting eyes)

, The specific improvement makes the flame goblin's butt a little bit more!For example, written as a peach...

That's about it, of course, if you are too lazy, just write the first two points.

Because the clearer and perfect you write, the more clearly I read, the more likely this book is to improve.

Otherwise, you typed for a long time and just didn’t make it clear. I was confused and might even have the opposite effect-this is the source of the misunderstanding between men and women. Don’t ask me how I knew...

Finally, thank every reader!

dhijianxian0

.