Dungeons for the Devil, Dungeons for the Core (Book Version Title: A Different World Dungeon Made with the Devil)

The Bishop of Yalta, Bocca I, had suffered from reports brought earlier by the Adventurer Guild of Vazari.

"No sign of a violent monster around Morrow, then...?

Just asking sounds like a report to me. No, it is actually true for the inhabitants of Moreau, but it was not the same for one Bocca I.

"Now it is almost certain that Cals' idiot died in the dungeon... I mean, it is certain that our Yaltan brave man has defeated the dungeon twice..."

The bishop thinks so quietly that he wants to say what has happened to the previous one. Let's not forget that the brave men appointed by Yalta have been killed while standing. It means that the glory of my Yalta religion will fall, so that's the problem, but now we have to think of something else. In other words, it was both dungeons that killed the brave men.

With that and this here, the attention to the dungeon has now increased to the point where there has never been any attention to the dungeon. That's the reward. It is inevitable that the perception that the dungeon is dangerous will increase. Where and what consequences it will have......

Unconsciously, the bishop had walked over in front of the cupboard and had the liquor cup in his hand.

(Once again it is recognized that the dungeon is a dangerous one, that is fine. Or because it's been such a perception for a long time. Something is going to change now.

The Patriarch slowly tilts the cup with a note of liquor. The fragrance of richness and richness swells through the nasal cavity, and the aromatic flavour swells the tongue.

(The problem is the hazard assessment of the dungeon…. They call those two dungeons "twin dungeons"...... are they relatively special examples compared to others......)

Hmm, and I try to think back to the dungeon entanglement stories I've heard recently.

(Aside from the abominable "rock cave," it was the poisonous and angry dungeons in the... theodrum that came up on the subject.... they did call it an abandoned pit or something. I remember hearing about that dangerous dungeon too. Then... there must have been one dungeon near the border with Theodoram. I don't remember hearing about this... I'll check it out later)

I'll think of something else, but apart from Shard's ruins, that's about all the dungeons we talked about seem to be. How much rank are the two dungeons that killed the Yaltan brave men in these dungeons?

(If "twin dungeons" just jump through and are dangerous, that's fine. But if other dungeons were equally dangerous... it would be a bit of a hassle)

The bishop leans further toward the glass as he ponders.

(If it was as dangerous as before, there is no problem. However, if the hazards have increased in comparison to traditional dungeons…)

Containing a new cup in his mouth, the bishop proceeds with his thinking.

(... in which case... the recent dungeons (...) are all getting worse...)

The truth is that Crowe is only mass-producing dangerous dungeons, but if those who do not know such a backward circumstance saw it, it was also impossible to create misunderstandings like those of a bishop. And based on such a misconception, it seemed that something disturbing was happening in the present progression.

(This may be a serious matter. but maybe not. It's a dungeon even though it's getting worse.)

Basically, there is no harm done by the dungeon to those who do not enter the dungeon. Ning - to feed - actively tries to attract humans, and it provides them with that and other rare materials. Even if the unlucky get eaten, it's basically like a pile of treasure.

The only exception is the stampede, but it is not difficult to suppress the occurrence if you mistake the dungeon monster for the time being. Dungeons are to be used, not crusaded. And it is the realization of this world that those who intend to use the dungeon should deal with the dangers that come down on them at their own risk….

(Hmm... Can't we use our hands to complain about the dangers of the dungeon, to sacrifice it to the divine enemy, and to engage the faithful...)

And as for Yaltanism, there was another issue to consider. It is not clear what a "brave man" of Yalta religion should do, but it would be the statue of a brave man expected of the people to stand up at least against a being without enemies to men. If you complain about the dangers of a dungeon, it will be for the brave to stand up to that dangerous dungeon… to a dungeon that has already defeated two brave men. If even the third generation of brave men had suffered defeat in the dungeon, the gaze directed at Yaltaism would have included mockery and pity through the cold. We must definitely avoid such a situation.

Then there is no profit in hustling about the ferocity of the dungeon… or very awkward (first). That is how the bishop concluded.

... Had he known a "dungeon" like the "pit" where dungeon monsters are left outside to hunt for their prey, or the "Christmas City" where they fly around freely to shell, he would not have made that decision lightly.

(If so... is it fortunate not to make a senseless noise here and solemnly choose the next generation of brave men? But......)

The bishop had a deep sigh.