Rebirth Enchanted Xiangjiang

In Chinese film censorship, the screening targets are nothing more than those types: love, violence, morality, and politics.

Let's look at the love and violence first.This unified system has never admitted that adults can enjoy sex and violence as a form of entertainment, which is self-evident.

There is no place in China for legal consumption of seductive content, and movies have no reason to be an exception.

Our party advocates a Puritan-style morality. This nominal ethics and cleanliness has the same goal as the Catholic Church. It is different from Western countries where politics and religion are separated. Its Puritan-style morality has been implemented in all aspects of social life by administrative means. It is almost impossible to get rid of its control over our social life and even spiritual life.As for politics... this is self-explanatory.

Moreover, in our great country, it is impossible to get rid of the restrictions on moral and political content of censorship by advocating the right to freedom of speech in movies as in some Western countries.This is also self-explanatory.

In other words, film censorship will exist for a long time in the country, and on this basis, superimposing a grading system, Qiao Feng can't see any substantial significance.

Of course, you can still analyze this possibility, and you can think about what the movie market in mainland my country would be if there was a classification system.

In the Mainland for decades, even if there is a classification system, there is no need to think about the "political theme" dimension. Therefore, this classification system with Chinese characteristics can deal with issues in the two directions of seism and violence at most.

Although there is no evidence, I boldly assert that the scale of pornography and violence (occasionally dew point, a little blood) that can be seen in current movies in China is basically the largest scale allowed by the system.

But this by no means means that Chinese films can handle sex and violent content in a fair manner from now on, reaching the standards of certain Western sex movies or Hong Kong san-level movies in the 1990s. That is a dream.

Needless to say, the reason is that under the unified Puritan morality, love and violence have never been recognized as reasonable consumer needs.Therefore, hoping that the introduction of the so-called classification system can expand the expression space of film creation is basically an unattainable dream.

Movies are a very important ideology.

In China, basically things related to ideology will not be legalized. The most obvious is: no film law, no news law, no Internet law.

Thinking of another time and space, when Google was driven out of our country in the 21st century, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs only said that our country administers the Internet in accordance with the law, but it never said which one it depends on.

why?

Because of a law, even if you have 10,000 articles, there are areas that you cannot cover. There will always be new incidents that hit the flaws of this law. This is why the laws of various countries must be constantly revised.Even if the US Constitution hasn't changed a single word for more than 200 years, wouldn't there be so many amendments?

So in other words, there is a law, which means you will always have loopholes, but no law means that you have no loopholes, because an administrative order can make up for the loopholes and get you out of half of your body. Kick back.

When it comes to ideology, the government will never allow you to take advantage of it. Therefore, the classification of movies and the delusional retreat of Scissors will not be implemented in China.

Some people say that "movie classification system" is always reluctantly associated with "se sentiment". They feel that this is very unfair, because for mature movie classification systems, the content of se sentiment is only one of the factors that affect the classification of movies. Content such as blood, violence, vulgarity, and horror will also affect the rating of the film.

Then I started to talk about how good the American grading system is, and then I took the Toy Story 3, which was screened in China, Owl Kingdom: Legend of the Guardians, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows·Part I, Resident Evil 4: God of War Reborn, Lust, Quit talking about these types of films.

Because these five films exactly represent the five classifications of the United States,

Films of various levels have been introduced and released on a large scale in China, and they have achieved relatively good box office results. This shows that domestic audiences have a corresponding market consumption space for films of various levels and can choose rationally. Suitable for their own movie products for consumption.

In Qiao Feng's opinion, this kind of rhetoric is completely a secret exchange of concepts, because the release of such a film in China means that it was not the original film before.

Especially the last color.Quit.

This kind of film is released in China, and all the explicit clips are deleted before it is released. After this kind of film is cut, even if it is obtained in the United States or Hong Kong, it is already regarded as a film that can be watched by the whole people, so This is not representative.

Regarding the difficulty of film classification, regardless of political factors, blood, violence, vulgarity, and horror are not a problem at all. In our country, there are always no strict requirements for violence and vulgarity, just like the films of Cheng Long and Zhou Xingchi. It can be shown in the mainland, but it is not suitable for children in Hong Kong.

Therefore, it is completely inappropriate to apply the American set to domestic movies. The cultural background and political form are not the same. How can it be classified like the United States.

It is R-rated in the United States. After being cut in China, how can it be said to be R-rated? It must be restricted to young people.

To put it bluntly, films of all levels in the United States can be released in the country, and they have achieved good box office results. It is not because domestic audiences have a corresponding market consumption space for films of various levels, nor because they can all be rational. They choose the film products that suit them for consumption, but because the government specially cut all films of all grades into a look that can meet the domestic screening requirements.

This is the meaning and necessity of censorship.

If there is no grading system, there will be no segmented market, and without a segmented market, there will be no virtuous circular business pattern, and without a virtuous business pattern, there will be no real prosperity of Chinese films in commerce and art.

This is all bullshit.

It is nonsense to say that there is a market segmentation, that there is a corresponding market consumption space, and that the audience can rationally choose film products that suit them for consumption.

Because the person who said this or this kind of people deliberately avoided one thing that the country and ordinary people agree with, that is, love se, avoiding this thing, saying everything is no good.

To download the latest txt e-book of this book, please click:

Mobile phone reading of this book:

Published book reviews:

In order to facilitate the next reading, you can click on "Favorites" below to record the reading record of this time (points that cannot be circumvented in Chapter 486), and you can see it next time you open the bookshelf!Please recommend this book to your friends (QQ, blog, WeChat, etc.), thank you for your support!!