At the end of this meeting, there are many plans to be implemented.

First, the Green Lantern has to pick a schedule for next year anyway. So far, Martin Campbell, who once relied on the two 007 movies, is in an even more embarrassing situation on the crew. However, he was already on the verge of being fired. Everyone doesn’t like whoever asked him to shoot something. It’s just that the workload of making up the shoot was too much, and Warner didn’t want to throw money in it, so he still kept him for finishing...

Second, set up the "Batman 3" project as soon as possible. The whole team still follows the meaning of Nolan and Firefly, and no longer seeks personal gain. It is said that since the revenue of "The Dark Knight" is too large, Warner's contract will not be broken, but there are too many small actions. When I got up, some payments were delayed until the deadline, but now I don’t want to delay anymore;

Not only that, Kevin Tsujihara is very generous, "Isn’t Nolan unwilling to join the clown in the third part, hoping to introduce a new role as a contradiction? Promise him. Isn’t the third part’s production contract officially signed yet? Give him the best salary directly."

"Tell them that as long as Nolan Studio can participate in the shooting, we will directly pay the highest producer + director's 20 points in North America. The basic salary is 10 million and half of the contract is signed. In addition, the investment rights of Firefly No change, and 5 more points for offline home entertainment.

Guys, I hope to see Batman's name on the box office charts in 12 years at the latest."

Based on the accumulated popularity of "The Dark Knight", as long as the third part is not too bad, it is at least 1 billion in the global box office volume. According to this standard, it can be said to be quite generous. So, people are not pressured or pressed. Many things will not let go.

In other words, the performance of "Reunion" makes Warner have to pursue the DC project. After all, North America has 220 million in the first week, not counting the authorized peripherals and offline entertainment. According to the talks between Universal, Sony and the North American Theater Alliance The split was 80% in the first three weeks, which means that they returned $176 million in the first week.

How much does the entire film cost?But 200 million.

This means that on the week of the movie's release, the biggest expense is almost wiped out. Then even if the standard for gradually dividing the accounts is to favor the theater, the three can lie down and count the money before the release.

Why is Warner anxious?Marvel's speed of return with a pile of second- and third-tier heroes is comparable to printing money, which is something that all studios look forward to.

For the film and television industry, many projects that want to earn considerable wealth, including manpower and energy costs, need to operate for several years. No one does not want to increase the turnover speed.

Thinking of this, Kevin can't care about delaying the overall situation for a little profit. He needs to fully realize the value of Nolan's Batman first, and then advance their DC universe.

Yes, the universe, following the hot web narrative concept of "Reunion", just like Lehman's talk in Golden State, has become what every ambitious studio is thinking, pondering, and applying it. Shooting mode.

And the first successful case of the Marvel Cinematic Universe is naturally a point of study.

Even this model has its drawbacks. For example, it must have enough volume and a worldview that can be accepted by movie fans. This means that non-featured films cannot be filmed. In the past, Hollywood made a hit by accident and thought about the previous one. Material is constantly added on the basis of, but the net-like narrative has no turning back once the bow is opened, unless the invested resources, funds, and ideas are all chosen to be discarded.

There is no doubt that it actually increases the studio’s shooting risk and the estimated risk of the market, but once it succeeds, the benefits are obvious, whether it is profit margins or its super hematopoietic and star-making capabilities, Even easy to cultivate, deepen the dependence of the fan audience, etc., are far stronger than ordinary projects.

Just look at "Reunion". A bunch of images that are not necessarily out of the circle in the comics world are sought after by so many passers-by. Isn't such a star-making ability still enviable?

As for holding people?The current brokerage companies are crazy and generally want to add people to Marvel's projects.

Donnie, Evans, Scarlett, Mark will not say anything. Clark Gregg plays a Coleson agent who has been out of the country continuously. After receiving a lunch box, he can receive a few movie books, and follow the past in sitcoms and soap operas. The miscellaneous stars are far apart.

Let’s just put it this way, how many actors have waited for a lifetime and can’t wait for a character that can make the audience remember something. In the Marvel project, those who have a little bit of a role can be brilliant. This is not a certainty that sells the world view and sells well. Awesome.

As for Kevin's last command, it is to advance the adaptation of the prequel "The Hobbit" of "The Lord of the Rings" as soon as possible.

This can be regarded as an insurance for his production work, in case one side is disadvantageous, the other side guarantees revenue.

You should know that for the issue of the split of the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, New Line has repeatedly filed lawsuits with director Jackson and the copyright owner Tolkien Heritage Trust. Later, New Line was reorganized and merged into Warner in situ, and Warner also had the corresponding problem. face.

However, compared to the new line, Warner is obviously more courageous, and the division of the project's income has relatively relaxed the two parties.

Look, Warner's fleeting years are not going well and a strong enemy is taking over the Manga market. They can still come up with so many high-quality projects. This is the bottom line.

...

Facing the concept of the movie universe, each manufacturer has its own thinking and response.

If Warner can learn from the particularities of DC and Marvel with a little modification, some people don't even have the basis to carry this grand model.

In the words of Summit Entertainment, "People have this foundation, what do we have? Is it possible to create a universe that can be relied on by the audience?"

Don't make trouble, the original feature film is that many manufacturers risk the wrong estimation to create a universe, how much imagination, execution, financial resources, and energy?

The small factory has no conditions to do it, what about the big factory?

Sony can only get a small spider, no matter how it is derived, it is difficult to weave a web. Similarly, Fox’s "X-Men" finally launched the "Wolverine" project. I don’t know how long it has been. I want to build on this foundation. I have encountered a lot of difficulties while continuing to innovate, so there is no time for anything else.

But I don't want to, the appearance of "Reunion" also stimulated one person.

Disney's conference room.

While the crowd was staring at the box office, Robert Iger only noticed the soaring Marvel figure figure and toy sales market.

It's just that. In the key theme parks, Marvel is eyeing Universal, which makes Disney worry.

As we all know, Di Baobao’s housekeeping skill is a three-dimensional profit intertwined with content + channels.

It can be said that they pay more attention to the content of controllable development of value-added services outside the box office than everyone else.